Thursday, 10 September 2009
Viorica suffers through Sarah Rees-Brennan's "The Demon's Lexicon"
~
Why did I read this? Why?!?
I knew that the author was Internet Famous before being published. I knew she was part of Cassandra Cla(i)re's writing circle - in fact, both CC and Holly Black have blurbs on the back. I knew that the entire premise sounded like a Supernatural ripoff. And yet, I ignored all my better instincts and checked the damn thing out of the library.
I must be a masochist.
The Demon's Lexicon revolves around two brothers, Sam and Dean - sorry, Nick and Alan. Their father has been killed by demons, and their mother has lost her mind, so at the beginning of the story, they're on their own except for each other. Right off the bat, I noticed that the prose was . . . iffy. Bickering and dropping exposition in the middle of a demon attack iffy. Not to mention lines like this:
This sentence is awful - not because of the words used, but because of the way they're arranged. You do not use passive tense when describing a person's voice, especially not if that voice is saying something like "Don't hurt her." Your characters should at least be in charge of their own voices.
So the speaker is revealed to be a wibbling boy by the name of Jamie Crawford, who speaks entirely in Python-esque wisecracks- not the best trait to assign to a character who's supposed to be terrified for his life. As Dan noted in his City of Bones review, the reader won't believe that the character is frightened if they're cracking jokes. Jamie came to the brothers along with his sister Mae, who "was the weird girl in the class above [Nick], who dyed her hair pink and always wore a lot of pentagrams and crystals. Right now, she was also wearing chandelier earrings and a violently pink t-shirt that read 'Romeo and Juliet Wouldn't Have Lasted'."
Note to authors: having your characters wear smarmy t-shirts doesn't make them (or you) look smart. It just irritates the reader, who would like to see the plot move along rather than get bogged down with pointless description. This whole paragraph is just an excuse for Nick to muse about how his dad warned him not to draw attention to himself, because "the magicians" would find him if he did. Because magicians look for teenaged posers dripping in jewelery and clothing that scream "Look at me! I'm unique!" apparently.
(I'm on page ten at this point. God help me.)
So the reason that Jamie and his sister have come to Cal and Niko- sorry, Nick and Alan- is because Jamie (who is gay with a capital G, by the way - and I'm talking "wears lavendar shirts and earrings" gay. Between that, the wisecracks, and the fact that's he's always on the verge of wetting himself with terror, I suspect that Ms. Rees-Brennan picked him up at the local Stereotyped Gay Sidekicks warehouse) has been marked by a demon. His mark is a third-tier mark, which means that either he or the magician who put the mark on him has to be sacrificed to a demon. Nick, who is cynical and hard-edged and protective of his family (gee, does that sound familiar to anyone else?) wants Jamie and Mae out of his house before they bring the demons down on him and his brother, but then it is discovered that - gasp! - Alan's been marked as well. Alan, by the way, is sensitive and kind, in direct contrast to his brother, and is this ringing any bells? Nick changes his tune entirely, and wants to track down whoever it is that's responsible for these marks, and kill them. Of course, complications arise, secrets are revealed, and none of Our Heroes die, though Nick does get turned into a demon, becoming the very thing he hunts. I repeat: DOES. THIS. SOUND. FAMILIAR?
There are a lot of things wrong with this book, and I'm not just talking about the blatant unoriginality of it all- though I could probably write an entire separate article about that. Aside from the Nick and Alan/Dean and Sam parallels, you've got demons who turn into plumes of black smoke when exorcised, emotionally absent/dead parents, and a Goblin Market (hi there, Hellboy!). Aside from all the ripoffs, the prose is middling-to-awful ("The pipe gave a long metallic groan, like an ancient robot about to fall to pieces."), the characters display about one personality trait each (Nick is hard-edged; Alan is sympathetic; Mae is tough; Jamie is fey.), the plot is dull, and the overall impression is that of something that's been repeatedly photocopied, losing more and more of the original's appeal each time it was copied. Demons and magicians and talismans and ravens; it's all been done before, and the book has nothing new to offer. Do yourself a favour and pick up some old-school urban fantasy as well; even Neil Gaiman has more to offer than this reheated stew of cliches.
I knew that the author was Internet Famous before being published. I knew she was part of Cassandra Cla(i)re's writing circle - in fact, both CC and Holly Black have blurbs on the back. I knew that the entire premise sounded like a Supernatural ripoff. And yet, I ignored all my better instincts and checked the damn thing out of the library.
I must be a masochist.

The Demon's Lexicon revolves around two brothers, Sam and Dean - sorry, Nick and Alan. Their father has been killed by demons, and their mother has lost her mind, so at the beginning of the story, they're on their own except for each other. Right off the bat, I noticed that the prose was . . . iffy. Bickering and dropping exposition in the middle of a demon attack iffy. Not to mention lines like this:
"Don't hurt her!" yelped a boy's voice.
This sentence is awful - not because of the words used, but because of the way they're arranged. You do not use passive tense when describing a person's voice, especially not if that voice is saying something like "Don't hurt her." Your characters should at least be in charge of their own voices.
So the speaker is revealed to be a wibbling boy by the name of Jamie Crawford, who speaks entirely in Python-esque wisecracks- not the best trait to assign to a character who's supposed to be terrified for his life. As Dan noted in his City of Bones review, the reader won't believe that the character is frightened if they're cracking jokes. Jamie came to the brothers along with his sister Mae, who "was the weird girl in the class above [Nick], who dyed her hair pink and always wore a lot of pentagrams and crystals. Right now, she was also wearing chandelier earrings and a violently pink t-shirt that read 'Romeo and Juliet Wouldn't Have Lasted'."
Note to authors: having your characters wear smarmy t-shirts doesn't make them (or you) look smart. It just irritates the reader, who would like to see the plot move along rather than get bogged down with pointless description. This whole paragraph is just an excuse for Nick to muse about how his dad warned him not to draw attention to himself, because "the magicians" would find him if he did. Because magicians look for teenaged posers dripping in jewelery and clothing that scream "Look at me! I'm unique!" apparently.
(I'm on page ten at this point. God help me.)
So the reason that Jamie and his sister have come to Cal and Niko- sorry, Nick and Alan- is because Jamie (who is gay with a capital G, by the way - and I'm talking "wears lavendar shirts and earrings" gay. Between that, the wisecracks, and the fact that's he's always on the verge of wetting himself with terror, I suspect that Ms. Rees-Brennan picked him up at the local Stereotyped Gay Sidekicks warehouse) has been marked by a demon. His mark is a third-tier mark, which means that either he or the magician who put the mark on him has to be sacrificed to a demon. Nick, who is cynical and hard-edged and protective of his family (gee, does that sound familiar to anyone else?) wants Jamie and Mae out of his house before they bring the demons down on him and his brother, but then it is discovered that - gasp! - Alan's been marked as well. Alan, by the way, is sensitive and kind, in direct contrast to his brother, and is this ringing any bells? Nick changes his tune entirely, and wants to track down whoever it is that's responsible for these marks, and kill them. Of course, complications arise, secrets are revealed, and none of Our Heroes die, though Nick does get turned into a demon, becoming the very thing he hunts. I repeat: DOES. THIS. SOUND. FAMILIAR?
There are a lot of things wrong with this book, and I'm not just talking about the blatant unoriginality of it all- though I could probably write an entire separate article about that. Aside from the Nick and Alan/Dean and Sam parallels, you've got demons who turn into plumes of black smoke when exorcised, emotionally absent/dead parents, and a Goblin Market (hi there, Hellboy!). Aside from all the ripoffs, the prose is middling-to-awful ("The pipe gave a long metallic groan, like an ancient robot about to fall to pieces."), the characters display about one personality trait each (Nick is hard-edged; Alan is sympathetic; Mae is tough; Jamie is fey.), the plot is dull, and the overall impression is that of something that's been repeatedly photocopied, losing more and more of the original's appeal each time it was copied. Demons and magicians and talismans and ravens; it's all been done before, and the book has nothing new to offer. Do yourself a favour and pick up some old-school urban fantasy as well; even Neil Gaiman has more to offer than this reheated stew of cliches.
Themes: Sci-fi / Fantasy, Young Adult / Children
~
bookmark this with - facebook - delicious - digg - stumbleupon - reddit
~
I do see a lot of your criticisms but actually they didn't bother me. The characters are quite stereotypical but I thought Brennan worked quite well with them once she'd got them established.
I also I think you slightly missed the revelation about Nick. I kind of didn't want to give the game away in my review but I guess since we're in spoilersville I might as well take a pitstop here. It's not that he is turned into a demon, it's that he is a demon, forced into a human body - I know that's a pretty subtle difference but I was dumb and didn't see it coming and I think it really does make the book.
Just my two cents.
I guess I'm going to have to write that review I've been putting off so I can properly say how much I loved this book.
Also, totally cause I'm curious, what don't you like about Neil Gaiman's stuff?
As Dan noted in his City of Bones review, the reader won't believe that the character is frightened if they're cracking jokes.
I don't know; I certainly believe he's scared. I tend to joke around when I'm nervous too, though admittedly, I dunno if I'd still do that if I was terrified for my life.
Didn't mind the over-description, either. Then again, I'm a big fan of Charlaine Harris and even The Wheel of Time, so obviously, I have significant stamina for description. Interestingly enough, while I have a lot of patience for description, I hardly ever take in what I'm reading/hearing. So, first instance, I went through the entire book without ever noticing Jamie's lavender shirts.
I also rather enjoyed the smarmy t-shirt (I read t-shirts and bumper stickers compulsively, so I find it nice when they say something clever). I got a real kick out of the scene in Storm Front when Harry Dresden ends up wearing a t-shirt which says “Easter is Canceled—They Found the Body.” (Yes, that detail I remembered.)
even Neil Gaiman has more to offer than this reheated stew of cliches
I beg to differ: Anansi Boys was moderately engaging, American Gods was mediocre at best and Coraline could've put me to sleep. At least The Demon's Lexicon kept me turning pages at a fairly steady clip. (Dunno about Viorica, but that's my problem with Gaiman in a nutshell, rosindubh.)
Kyra: The characters are quite stereotypical but I thought Brennan worked quite well with them once she'd got them established.
Perhaps we should say they're archetypal. I agree that once they're established as such, Rees Brennan fleshed them out rather nicely, with the possible exception of Jamie (hope he gets more character development in the next book).
At least Clare's Token Gay Character didn't also double as the Damsel in Distress.
LOL!
Personally, I really liked Nick's standoffish protectiveness and Alan's quiet (yet extremely fierce) devotion and determination. I thought Nick's POV was refreshing and intriguing because it was so different from many that I've come across.
As for Jamie, it seems to me that she's setting him up as a major player in future books and we're supposed to see his current wavering to be a part of his character growth. Plus, he did have a spine and showed true bravery on more than one occasion.
You're certainly welcome to your opinion and I can understand why this might not have been your cuppa. All the same, I'll have to respectfully disagree with you on most of your points, most especially about the characters being all one dimensional. There's room for growth and development for them all, of course, but I like the start provided here and none of them struck me as being overly simplistic. Here's hoping you find something more to your liking?