The Winchesters Go To England

by Viorica

Viorica suffers through Sarah Rees-Brennan's "The Demon's Lexicon"
~
Why did I read this? Why?!?

I knew that the author was Internet Famous before being published. I knew she was part of Cassandra Cla(i)re's writing circle - in fact, both CC and Holly Black have blurbs on the back. I knew that the entire premise sounded like a Supernatural ripoff. And yet, I ignored all my better instincts and checked the damn thing out of the library.

I must be a masochist.

The Demon's Lexicon revolves around two brothers, Sam and Dean - sorry, Nick and Alan. Their father has been killed by demons, and their mother has lost her mind, so at the beginning of the story, they're on their own except for each other. Right off the bat, I noticed that the prose was . . . iffy. Bickering and dropping exposition in the middle of a demon attack iffy. Not to mention lines like this:
"Don't hurt her!" yelped a boy's voice.

This sentence is awful - not because of the words used, but because of the way they're arranged. You do not use passive tense when describing a person's voice, especially not if that voice is saying something like "Don't hurt her." Your characters should at least be in charge of their own voices.

So the speaker is revealed to be a wibbling boy by the name of Jamie Crawford, who speaks entirely in Python-esque wisecracks- not the best trait to assign to a character who's supposed to be terrified for his life. As Dan noted in his City of Bones review, the reader won't believe that the character is frightened if they're cracking jokes. Jamie came to the brothers along with his sister Mae, who "was the weird girl in the class above [Nick], who dyed her hair pink and always wore a lot of pentagrams and crystals. Right now, she was also wearing chandelier earrings and a violently pink t-shirt that read 'Romeo and Juliet Wouldn't Have Lasted'."

Note to authors: having your characters wear smarmy t-shirts doesn't make them (or you) look smart. It just irritates the reader, who would like to see the plot move along rather than get bogged down with pointless description. This whole paragraph is just an excuse for Nick to muse about how his dad warned him not to draw attention to himself, because "the magicians" would find him if he did. Because magicians look for teenaged posers dripping in jewelery and clothing that scream "Look at me! I'm unique!" apparently.

(I'm on page ten at this point. God help me.)

So the reason that Jamie and his sister have come to Cal and Niko- sorry, Nick and Alan- is because Jamie (who is gay with a capital G, by the way - and I'm talking "wears lavendar shirts and earrings" gay. Between that, the wisecracks, and the fact that's he's always on the verge of wetting himself with terror, I suspect that Ms. Rees-Brennan picked him up at the local Stereotyped Gay Sidekicks warehouse) has been marked by a demon. His mark is a third-tier mark, which means that either he or the magician who put the mark on him has to be sacrificed to a demon. Nick, who is cynical and hard-edged and protective of his family (gee, does that sound familiar to anyone else?) wants Jamie and Mae out of his house before they bring the demons down on him and his brother, but then it is discovered that - gasp! - Alan's been marked as well. Alan, by the way, is sensitive and kind, in direct contrast to his brother, and is this ringing any bells? Nick changes his tune entirely, and wants to track down whoever it is that's responsible for these marks, and kill them. Of course, complications arise, secrets are revealed, and none of Our Heroes die, though Nick does get turned into a demon, becoming the very thing he hunts. I repeat: DOES. THIS. SOUND. FAMILIAR?

There are a lot of things wrong with this book, and I'm not just talking about the blatant unoriginality of it all- though I could probably write an entire separate article about that. Aside from the Nick and Alan/Dean and Sam parallels, you've got demons who turn into plumes of black smoke when exorcised, emotionally absent/dead parents, and a Goblin Market (hi there, Hellboy!). Aside from all the ripoffs, the prose is middling-to-awful ("The pipe gave a long metallic groan, like an ancient robot about to fall to pieces."), the characters display about one personality trait each (Nick is hard-edged; Alan is sympathetic; Mae is tough; Jamie is fey.), the plot is dull, and the overall impression is that of something that's been repeatedly photocopied, losing more and more of the original's appeal each time it was copied. Demons and magicians and talismans and ravens; it's all been done before, and the book has nothing new to offer. Do yourself a favour and pick up some old-school urban fantasy as well; even Neil Gaiman has more to offer than this reheated stew of cliches.
~

bookmark this with - facebook - delicious - digg - stumbleupon - reddit

~
Comments (go to latest)
Kyra Smith at 11:28 on 2009-09-10
Okay, this is hilarious - I, too, just read The Demon's Lexcion and, uh, *blush* I really liked it. It's possibly I had a Terrible Failure of Taste. In fact, I've just finished my review... I guess I'll post it anyway so we have the contrast.

I do see a lot of your criticisms but actually they didn't bother me. The characters are quite stereotypical but I thought Brennan worked quite well with them once she'd got them established.

I also I think you slightly missed the revelation about Nick. I kind of didn't want to give the game away in my review but I guess since we're in spoilersville I might as well take a pitstop here. It's not that he is turned into a demon, it's that he is a demon, forced into a human body - I know that's a pretty subtle difference but I was dumb and didn't see it coming and I think it really does make the book.
Sister Magpie at 19:29 on 2009-09-10
Not challenging your reactions to the book, but it's not so much like Supernatural (which in this case I know it wasn't ripped off from, since SRB doesn't watch it) as you're describing it. There are two brothers who hunt/are hunted by demons yes, but they're not Sam and Dean clones and there is no theme about becoming the very thing one hunts.
Kyra Smith at 20:47 on 2009-09-10
To be fair, regardless of whether it was conscious or not, there is a Sam and Dean vibe to the dynamic between the brothers at the beginning of the novel - early Sam and Dean, anyway, before Supernatural started sucking horribly (manly sobs and misogyny). On the other hand, I think it soon develops away from that, and I liked Nick and Alan (although I didn't really like Nick obviously) much more than I like Sam and Dean.
Sister Magpie at 21:32 on 2009-09-10
Oh yeah, I totally get why the comparison to Supernatural is obvious in the set up. But you have to pound out a lot of differences to make it all the same imo.
http://mary-j-59.livejournal.com/ at 05:02 on 2009-09-12
I've got a review of this one on my blog, actually. I loved it - but then, I've never heard of Supernatural, nor of the Winchesters, whoever they are. So I thought the story quite original, and Nick's an amazing character, IMHO.

Just my two cents.
http://roisindubh211.livejournal.com/ at 20:07 on 2009-09-13
Wow. I loved this, maybe because I expected to- I've been reading Brennan's fanfiction for a long time, and, friend though she be of Cassandra Claire, she's waaaaay better at what she does. I've also never seen Supernatural, so that parallel didn't occur to me at all. Also, the "Goblin Market" idea is an old one, and there is absolutely no shame in sneaking ideas from folklore. It's kind of the done thing in fantasy.
I guess I'm going to have to write that review I've been putting off so I can properly say how much I loved this book.

Also, totally cause I'm curious, what don't you like about Neil Gaiman's stuff?
http://katsullivan.insanejournal.com/ at 13:06 on 2009-11-06
LOL! Just finished it myself. The book reads a lot like the Wincesters in London, complete with the convenience of the brothers not being related - yah!but like someone said, derivative work isn't necessarily bad because it is derivative. I guess I'd have liked it more if I had blacked out some of the grimmer aspects of Cassandra Clare from my mind. There were just too many echoes - right down to the exact detail of Big Bad putting a demon soul in his un-born child! I know Harry Potter BNFs generally share the same brain but that was just ridiculous. At least Clare'a Token Gay Character didn't also double as the Damsel in Distress.

Robinson L at 15:00 on 2009-11-09
I agree, the passive voice is bad, and maybe the writing is awkward at times—I really didn't notice. I tend to be inconsistent at noticing subpar writing. Sometimes it leaps out at me, often I just pass completely over it.

As Dan noted in his City of Bones review, the reader won't believe that the character is frightened if they're cracking jokes.
I don't know; I certainly believe he's scared. I tend to joke around when I'm nervous too, though admittedly, I dunno if I'd still do that if I was terrified for my life.

Didn't mind the over-description, either. Then again, I'm a big fan of Charlaine Harris and even The Wheel of Time, so obviously, I have significant stamina for description. Interestingly enough, while I have a lot of patience for description, I hardly ever take in what I'm reading/hearing. So, first instance, I went through the entire book without ever noticing Jamie's lavender shirts.

I also rather enjoyed the smarmy t-shirt (I read t-shirts and bumper stickers compulsively, so I find it nice when they say something clever). I got a real kick out of the scene in Storm Front when Harry Dresden ends up wearing a t-shirt which says “Easter is Canceled—They Found the Body.” (Yes, that detail I remembered.)

even Neil Gaiman has more to offer than this reheated stew of cliches
I beg to differ: Anansi Boys was moderately engaging, American Gods was mediocre at best and Coraline could've put me to sleep. At least The Demon's Lexicon kept me turning pages at a fairly steady clip. (Dunno about Viorica, but that's my problem with Gaiman in a nutshell, rosindubh.)

Kyra: The characters are quite stereotypical but I thought Brennan worked quite well with them once she'd got them established.
Perhaps we should say they're archetypal. I agree that once they're established as such, Rees Brennan fleshed them out rather nicely, with the possible exception of Jamie (hope he gets more character development in the next book).
Leia at 06:55 on 2009-11-11
It wasn't that bad. I did enjoy reading it and I really appreciate that there wasn't any ostentatious cliff-hangar at the end. But... yeah, the characters were unoriginal. I don't watch Supernatural but it seems like everyone in YA fiction fights demons these days. The twists would have been less predictable if they hadn't been there. It's reached a stage where I'll be more surprised when the villains goes, "Luke, I am NOT your father!" And like katsullivan said, the demon-child thing would have been shocking if CC hadn't done exactly the same thing in her book.

At least Clare's Token Gay Character didn't also double as the Damsel in Distress.

LOL!
http://ginzai.livejournal.com/ at 23:03 on 2009-11-30
I read TDL after a long delay and found myself highly enjoying it. Sure, there are some similarities between the Winchesters and Nick and Alan, but only in a rather superficial manner. I'd argue though that you got your brothers mixed up; Nick is far more like late series Sam than Dean, and frankly, Alan doesn't really remind me of either of them outside of a general overprotective big brother mentality that Dean also shares. I sort of laughed while I read it because I'm pretty sure the author hasn't ever watched Supernatural and it was like looking at a warped form of convergent evolution in action.

Personally, I really liked Nick's standoffish protectiveness and Alan's quiet (yet extremely fierce) devotion and determination. I thought Nick's POV was refreshing and intriguing because it was so different from many that I've come across.

As for Jamie, it seems to me that she's setting him up as a major player in future books and we're supposed to see his current wavering to be a part of his character growth. Plus, he did have a spine and showed true bravery on more than one occasion.

You're certainly welcome to your opinion and I can understand why this might not have been your cuppa. All the same, I'll have to respectfully disagree with you on most of your points, most especially about the characters being all one dimensional. There's room for growth and development for them all, of course, but I like the start provided here and none of them struck me as being overly simplistic. Here's hoping you find something more to your liking?
Kyra Smith at 10:17 on 2009-12-01
Hello Ginzai, and welcome to Fb. I have to say, I rather liked TDL m'self, although I can see where Viorica's criticisms have come from (alternative review here)
In order to post comments, you need to log in to Ferretbrain or authenticate with OpenID. Don't have an account? See the About Us page for more details.

Show / Hide Comments -- More in September 2009