Thursday, 11 March 2010
Jedediah Berry's The Manual of Detection melds Chandleresque crime and Chesterton-inspired fantasy and comes up with a whole new flavour.
~
Jedediah Berry's debut novel, The Manual of Detection, is riddled with nostalgia. Taking its aesthetic and setting mainly from hardboiled detective fiction along the lines of Dashiell Hammett, it's a celebration of a subgenre of detective fiction which progress has left behind. The dawn of the Internet, mobile phones, and CCTV, as well as nearly a century of social change, mean that although it is still possible to write stories about a lone, honest detective trying to do what's right in a corrupt and decadent world, a good many of the tropes and situations that used to define the hardboiled genre by and large can't be applied to modern-day stories. However, by taking the tropes of Hammett and Chandler and applying them to a fantastic situation, Berry is able to get sufficient distance from particular times and places to enable him to ease off on the topicality that Hammett and Chandler brought to the table and wax philosophical instead.Make no mistake about it, The Manual of Detection is a fantasy novel. It is not a traditional high-fantasy novel set in world similar to a time period in Earth's history, and nor is it a modern-day fantasy along the lines of Tim Powers or Buffy, in which fantastic elements exist a world that is otherwise nigh-identical to present-day Earth. Rather, it is set in an unnamed rain-slicked coastal US city, in an unspecified time period that's probably somewhere between the 1930s and 1950s, and centres around Charles Unwin, a humble clerk from an unnamed, monolithic detective agency. Unwin's main duty is editing and filing the case notes provided by his assigned detective, Travis Sivart, whom he has never personally met due to the Agency's byzantine and mysterious internal policies. After dreaming of a strange encounter with Sivart, Unwin discovers Sivart has disappeared, and that he has been mysteriously promoted to the rank of detective - a promotion which has no precedent in the annals of the Agency. Convinced that this is a terrible mistake, Unwin goes to meet with Sivart's immediate superior, the Watcher Lamech, only to find that Lamech has been murdered; reluctantly investigating Sivart's disappearance (without quite being instructed to in so many words) he finds that old adversaries of Sivart such as the sinister magician Enoch Hoffmann and the femme fatale Cleo Greenwood, have returned to town.
And when he discovers that some of Sivart's most famous cases, such as The Oldest Murdered Man and The Three Deaths of Colonel Baker, were never correctly solved, things get really strange. Soon enough Unwin finds himself infiltrating a subconscious conspiracy of sleepwalkers, learns of the hidden arts of dream-detection, and discovers that the Agency - and Hoffmann's sinister criminal Carnival that acts as its mirror image - are merely the latest incarnations of two sides in an eternal battle between law and chaos, conscious and subconscious, waking life and dream. Unwin has to unravel it all if he's to stop a cataclysm whose seeds lie in the distant past, the key to which lies in Sivart's greatest case - The Man Who Stole November 12th. And he's guided only by his battered copy of The Manual of Detection, the Agency's guidebook for its detectives.
This is precisely as awesome as it sounds. Unwin is introduced to us as an unimaginative and unambitious pen-pusher, who only wishes to find Sivart so that he can go back to his old job; his reluctant transformation into a true detective is, whilst unlikely, entirely believable, and Berry handles the classic hardboiled tropes with skill. By adding the fantastic elements to the story bit by bit Berry allows himself time to establish them and make them seem like natural elements of the story before he brings in the next one. It's an approach not entirely unlike that GK Chesterton took with The Man Who Was Thursday, a story which begins as a spy thriller and finishes in the court of the Almighty. And whilst a cosmic conflict between Law and Chaos is a well-worn fantasy trope, dating back to Poul Anderson, and the idea of making sure that both Law and Chaos are unappealing choices and that a balance between the two is necessary likewise dates back to Michael Moorcock, it's rare to see these themes handled so adeptly. In particular, I like the fact that Berry is able to make Law seem unquestionably on the side of right and Chaos unquestionably evil at the beginning, and then by the end manages to make both of them seem capable of both great good and great evil to an equal extent - this is something Michael Moorcock frequently attempted with his stories, but often wasn't quite able to balance just right.
A confident novel, with less than 300 pages, telling a self-contained story that's entirely complete by the end - what more could you want from a fantasy novel? And from an author's debut as well! I predict great things from Mr Berry and will be watching him like a hawk. My only disappointment with The Manual of Detection has nothing to do with the story itself - it's the fact that certain ignorant persons seem to be describing it as steampunk, when not only is steampunk an irritating aesthetic that's become about as overexposed as zombies these days, but also The Manual of Detection comprises precisely none of the defining features of steampunk. Nobody could mistake the setting for a mock-Victorian one, and nobody could delude themselves into thinking there's any steam-driven technology in the story aside from a few trains, unless they were being deliberately moronic as part of an attempt to shoehorn as many works into the steampunk category as possible regardless of whether or not it even slightly makes sense to call them "steampunk". I'm talking to you, Michael Moorcock.
Themes: Books, Sci-fi / Fantasy
~
bookmark this with - facebook - delicious - digg - stumbleupon - reddit
~
...
...
...
GET OUT OF MY HEAD, ARTHUR!!!
I have to run now, so I'll say something deeply insightful tomorrow.
Are there any airships in it? Maybe that's how Mr Moorcock (wow, really?) became confused.
At least, there aren't any that play a sufficiently significant part that I remember them. And even if there were any, I would say that their presence wouldn't make it steampunk or even alternate history - there's nothing counterfactual about having airships bobbing about in the 1930s.
Personally, I found the Manual to be one of the few books I would happily describe as "Kafkaesque." It's a term that's thrown around a lot, but Berry actually manages recapture that sense of bureaucracy as an self-contained ecosystem and of that special type of palpable menace exuded by unknowable higher authority that drives Kafka's best work. (He avoids Kafka's tendency to destroy his protagonists at the end, but I guess that's not for everyone). At any rate, it's convinced me to make another attempt at The Trial.
Certainly, the fact that it's steam-powered seems to be an oddity - I don't remember that any of the conventional cars are described as steam-powered, which (if this really were steampunk) would surely be the norm.
Additionally, I don't think "interwarpunk" would work because the really striking counterfactual elements to the story aren't SFnal in the slightest. The secret art of dream detection, although the Agency exploits it using pseudotechnological jargon, is pretty clearly meant to be magical. Part of the point of steampunk/Elizabethanpunk/all those other words which misuse "-punk" is that they're a kind of alternate history which, ideally, uses alternative technologies which might conceivably have been developed at the time, whereas dream detection comes completely out of left field.
While I'm at it, I'll see your noir fantasy and raise you one comic noir fantasy.
Anyway, steampunk has never been that interested in the realism of the technology. If that was true, all difference engines would operate at a few steps below an ENIAC rather than being indistinguishable from modern computers.
The book sounds interesting though.
Thanks for this book, Arthur. I finished a few nights ago and have been thinking about it since as well as recommending it.
To your blockquote... I have not read any steampunk but I've seen some movies :)
Dream detection may have some mystical history but apparently those detected dreams can be cataloged and viewed later by listening to analog records. And then there's the steam truck that's already been addressed.
As for late 19th century, what about the bowler hats and carousel?
So maybe the steampunk is hinted at, a hotwaterMC5. Or maybe it's something a little bit different but still kind of similar, a watervapornewwave perhaps. I really don't know or care, but it sure was a good read. Thanks again!
Still, like vinyl records, very much in style in the 1920s/1930s. Whereas the sort of fiction the agency is modelled on (Hammett/Chandler) didn't even exist until the 1920s.
Maybe Berry brings his modeled detective agency to the late 19th century to season the meat of his noir with some steampunk salt.
I didn't get the nine eleven allegory at all and still don't. If it's there, Berry does a great job of not berating his readers with it.
Then you've forgotten something. When Unwin is talking to Cleo in her hotel room he strolls over to the hotel-provided record player and slaps on the disc. (If you remember, it just sounds like pigeons cooing.) He needs to go down to the Third Archive to play the record because the Third Archive has the equipment that lets him enter the dream - ordinary record players don't cut it. The idea that record players are common enough to be a standard feature of hotel rooms but expensive enough that Unwin doesn't have one at home pretty much places it in the 1920s/1930s for me.
Also, there are things like payphones in diners which feel far more 1920s/1930s than Victorian.
Also also, the steam truck (whether or not it's a traction engine) is pretty clearly a highly atypical artefact in the setting - the very fact that Unwin notes that it is a steam truck but doesn't refer to all the cars and taxis as "steam cars" or "steam taxis" suggest it is unusual rather than the norm.
What?
As far as I can work out the reviewer has assumed it's a 9/11 allegory because towards the end a bomb goes off in a tower. Even though (except in the world 9/11 Truthers) no bombs went off in the Twin Towers on 9/11. And the tower in question is singular, lacking in a twin. And if I remember right it doesn't collapse.
I mean, there's a Law vs. Chaos conflict there which arguably has featured in some 9-11/War On Terror-influenced fiction (such as, for example, The Dark Knight), but it's closer to Poul Anderson/Michael Moorcock cosmological conflicts than clash of civilisation nonsense.
Thanks to Niall's recent playpen post for leading me to the discovery that The Manual of Detection has won the Hammett prize.