Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.
at 22:26 on 30-06-2016
I just saw that Fox (UK) is going to air "The Book of Negroes" mini-series under the less historically-based title "Someone Knows My Name", starting July the 17th. I watched that last year and highly recommend it. It's kind of like "Schindler's List" but with revolution-era African Americans fleeing to Canada, as the British have to give up control of New York to the likes of Washington and Jefferson (both big-time slave-owners, remember). Apparently the original novel is based on a true story - there really was a document called the "Book of Negroes" listing a few thousand ex-slaves who were evacuated by the British in return for loyalty during the war.
I'd be interested to read what the problem with Tamora Pierce is, too, aside from maybe a writing style not designed with adult readers in mind. I've never read anything by her, as far as I can remember, but I think someone recently recommended her to me when I went on a rant about the way even supposedly feminist female fantasy authors always fail to have their young, usually not pregnant, heroines deal with menstruation; or only ever mentioning it at all if it's necessary for some contrived plot point, like vampire/werewolf attraction or far-too-early-to-be-realistic-in-a-premodern-society menarche triggering a child bride plot. (This 'taboo' is observed even in novels that do mention other bodily functions a few times, or where the authors have no problem describing characters throwing up after drinking too much, for example. Which gives the very unhealthy impression that the normal function of the cis-female body is so dirty and shameful that girls shouldn't even think about it, never mind commiserate with others about the unpleasantness that rules a quarter of their life. And that, really, what the authors are saying is: "No, of course cis-gendered girls can't really go on adventures. That would be far too difficult and messy to even contemplate, especially under pre-industrial circumstances. Yes, even with magic - no need to give even a perfunctory explanation about a magical contraception artifact or hormone-suppressing herbal tisanes or whatever. Instead, lets just pretend girls are all just cis boys with tennis balls down their shirt. I don't care if you can't relate to that.")
And congratulations on your new tax status, Adrienne. ;P
at 21:21 on 30-06-2016
The swift, efficient treachery practiced in the Tory party greatly contrasts with the ongoing bumbling of Parliamentary Labour's attempts to dispose of Jeremy Corbyn.
at 20:12 on 30-06-2016
, Arthur B
Given that his wife talks to him like he's a nervous child needing encouragement, I think he's more like Jim Hacker.
at 18:30 on 30-06-2016
According to Johnson's people, Michael Gove edited and approved Boris's column about how Britain is and always will be a part of Europe, persuaded Boris not to cut any endorsement-for-Cabinet-spot deals with Tory MPs, offered Foreign Secretary to George Osborne behind Boris's back and leaked it to the press, and announced his campaign for the leadership without informing Boris ahead of time.
Considering that he used to be Chief Whip, I now suspect that Michael Gove is, in fact, Francis Urquhart.
at 17:33 on 30-06-2016
, Arthur B
(I should clarify that I meant the Rik Mayall sitcom with Alan B'Stard, not the news magazine of the same name.)
at 17:22 on 30-06-2016
, Janne Kirjasniemi
Well, whatever else, both The Young Ones and Springtime for Hitler are less boring than The New Statesman. Politics are more popular now than since whenever!
at 17:19 on 30-06-2016
, James D
that's a deliberate stylistic choice!
So? Whether or not Brunner wanted The Shockwave Rider to be a chore to get through doesn't really matter to me as a reader. I am glad I read it, but I'm not sure I'd read it again.
I think part of the problem I had was going "back in time" after having read a lot of 80s cyberpunk (Bruce Sterling, William Gibson, etc.). The Shockwave Rider certainly had more substance than something like Neuromancer, but in comparison it just seemed really...uncool
. A lot of its ideas are interesting, sure, the interrogator especially was a great character, and there's a lot to chew on intellectually, but there's basically nothing in it that makes me go "WHOA, AWESOME" the way there is in a lot of later stuff TSR influenced.
Maybe there's not a lot of nutritional value in "whoa, awesome," but a little sugar in your oatmeal makes breakfast much more palatable.
at 15:45 on 30-06-2016
Boris's leadership bid was clearly predicated on the idea that a large majority of Tories would vote for Brexit but that Leave would nevertheless lose the referendum, thus providing Boris with compelling evidence of his sway over the party faithful while avoiding having to deal with the repercussions of leaving the EU (which he rather transparently doesn't really want to do).
I'm afraid I must disagree with Arthur on one point: this isn't The Young Ones, it's The Producers, and Brexit is Boris's "Springtime for Hitler."
at 15:36 on 30-06-2016
, Robinson L
@Adrienne: Glad to hear you're pulling things back together, and congratulations on your wedding and your upcoming move.
at 14:21 on 30-06-2016
, Arthur B
Gove is running, so far as I can tell, solely to spoil BoJo's bid. Lots of influential people in Tory circles were saying "Well, I have my reservations about Boris, but if he had Gove supporting him I think I'd vote for him". Gove's aides were literally pushing BoJo's bid and inviting people to the Boris campaign launch as recently as last night. So Gove declaring his own campaign spoiled things for Boris nicely.
I would not be surprised if Gove didn't actually bother campaigning, now that the job's been done.
We are in meltdown over here. In the space of a week British politics has gone from being like The New Statesman to The Young Ones.
at 13:00 on 30-06-2016
Looks like Dan's old bête noire Michael Gove may be the next Prime Minister.
at 10:17 on 30-06-2016
Robinson L: Nah, never gave up on it, just my life pretty well fell apart for a few years there. It's getting put back together these days, finally, although i got married and am moving to another country next month so things are still a little overwhelming. :)
at 10:16 on 30-06-2016
James D: "lots of philosophical asides" i'll definitely give you, but slow pace and not a lot of action? I'll argue with you on those. It definitely starts slow - and in flashback - but that's a deliberate stylistic choice! It starts with one thread and steadily brings in more, until you have LOTS of action (albeit much of it is downplayed, or delivered in weird interstices) and enough plot threads to get all tangled up in. Which is, of course, the point of the book, and the point of the book this one is a response to (which is Future Shock, by Alvin Toffler, who incidentally passed away yesterday.)
at 08:56 on 30-06-2016
, Janne Kirjasniemi
Interesting articles turning a critical eye on a widely praised author are always welcome in my book.
What happened in Greece is a result of such a perfect storm of different factors that there is little reason to think that Scotland would be in like danger. They don't seem to be the type to lend too much money, even if that opportunity should ever arise. Access to the common market on the other hand is a very good thing and especially so for a peripheral economy. If they are worried, they can always stay out of the euro. There are plenty of small economies that are doing well in the EU.
While Scotland re-joining the EU is of course not certain, depending on what happens, it is still very likely, since the main reason for leaving now would be the whole matter of the recent vote. As with N-Ireland. No more politics from me. Kind of a mess, the whole thing.
at 22:19 on 29-06-2016
I hope before the Scots rush into the EU as a small peripheral economy, they chat with a few Greeks.
at 21:49 on 29-06-2016
@Robinson: I can't imagine Scotland leaving the UK and not rejoining the EU, it'd be really vulnerable. Also Scotland is heavily pro-EU, and I suspect the other EU countries would be happy to ease its way: a chance to be the good guys, while making a point to the UK.
The big question is what happens to the Irelands.
at 18:41 on 29-06-2016
, Andrew Currall
Adrienne, I'd be interested to see your take on Tamora Pierce as well. I loved her books as a teenager. Reading them more recently, I've been a lot less impressed.
at 03:36 on 29-06-2016
, Robinson L
Adrienne: I daydreamed a long time back about submitting a The Shockwave Rider essay/review, too. I should do that
Please do, I've been wondering about that one for a while. I figured either it had been rejected or you gave up on the idea.
i have pissed myself off ALL OVER AGAIN at how goddamn bad Tamora Pierce is and how despite that people still praise her to the skies as great YA for teen girls ... could i perhaps submit something on the subject?
I'm looking forward to this one, too. I don't have much personal experience with Pierce's work, but one of my little sisters was obsessed with Terrier
and its sequel not so long ago (and maybe still is, I just haven't heard her talking about it so much). All the other stuff I hear about Pierce has been generally positive, and I didn't get far enough into the MetaFilter thread to see where she gets mentioned, so now I'm really curious to see what you find so objectionable in her writings.
Er, coming back to the British politics discussion for a second, a friend of friends recently shared this article
about a petition for a second referendum, citing the narrowness of the "Leave" vote's victory. Just curious if anyone had any thoughts on the subject.
I've been thinking lately about my experiences as a non-EU immigrant to the UK for my Master's studies, and about all the EU friends I made while I was there; I'd hate for them to have the same heavy restrictions I and my fellow non-EU students had to deal with abruptly thrust onto them.
At the risk of being overly irreverent about a situation I realize is very serious - if Scotland has another referendum about leaving Britain, will they likely (re)join the EU?
at 01:47 on 29-06-2016
, James D
I'm glad I read Shockwave Rider and it was well-conceived, had some good characters, wrapped the plot up pretty well, with tons of interesting ideas throughout ...but man was it a slog to get through. Slow pace, lots of philosophical asides, not a ton of action, a setting that's weird enough to be difficult to relate to but not weird enough to be fun - I've read and enjoyed others by Brunner but Shockwave Rider was one of those books which I found satisfying and interesting but would have trouble calling good.
at 00:23 on 29-06-2016
I daydreamed a long time back about submitting a The Shockwave Rider essay/review, too. I should do that - the book keeps getting more relevant, not less, despite having been written in fucking 1975.
at 10:11 on 28-06-2016
, Arthur B
Go ahead, I'd be interested to hear your thinks.
at 09:21 on 28-06-2016
Also as a result of that MetaFilter thread i have pissed myself off ALL OVER AGAIN at how goddamn bad Tamora Pierce is and how despite that people still praise her to the skies as great YA for teen girls. Andrew B or whoever is running this show these days, could i perhaps submit something on the subject?
at 07:02 on 28-06-2016
James D: Heinlein at short-story length is in general vastly superior to Heinlein at novel length, in my opinion. Several of his short stories are interesting, fun, and in some cases really challenging/idea-driven stuff. His novels are, in my fairly considered opinion, universally dreck.
at 22:15 on 27-06-2016
, Janne Kirjasniemi
My only experience with Heinlein was when I was going through some cardboard boxes full of spec fic books in a flea market on holiday and coming across some Heinlein titles. I remember thinking that Heinlein mihht be worthwhile since I hadn't read any and he was a well known author. So I chose the one with the nicest title, which also had some stuff about parallel earths, which I've always liked. Number of the beast. It didn't end well, and I couldn't get very far with it.
I mean, nipple movement and peculiar sentiments about familial relations are bad enough, but it was just so stupid in its arrogance about science, society and everything. And apparently it got even worse after that.
I guess it might be a good idea to check some of those YA things out, but then again, I'm behind on more interesting and essential stuff already. Farnham's Freehold sounds terribly unpleasant. But I recall there was some other authors dabblng in positive interest in the sixties, so I guess it was just one of the dark undersides of the breaking of sexual taboos, a marginal area where things just went too far with freedom aspect without considering the implications and consequences aspect. Curious that that whole alfa and beta nonsense was bandied about that far back(1964), but stupid ideas often are