Playpen

Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.

at 19:27 on 15-02-2012, Alasdair Czyrnyj
I dunno, from the graphic, it looks more like Jacob's just realized that baby is the antichrist.

Really, that's what his expression is saying? Then again, I've never been able to read Taylor Lautner's facial expressions; the price paid for not studying dendrology in university, I guess.

But yeah, I'm feeling a significant amount of morbid curiosity to see how they're going to try to get around the whole massive creepiness factor. My prediction: whatever they do, it won't be enough.

I feel exactly the opposite. I actually want them to make the whole situation as creepy as possible, no, even creepier than is possible, just to turn the whole thing into a proper spectacle. The way I see it, it'll simply be bringing Stephanie Meyer's confused attitude regarding sexuality to the fore and make the movie a true den of the authorial subconscious. Plus it'll be a shoo-in at the 2013 Oscars for makeup effects, which is always a good award to get.
permalink
at 20:58 on 14-02-2012, Michal
Either way, creepy CG'd baby is creepy.
permalink
at 18:06 on 14-02-2012, Robinson L
Well, since we see his expression first, I couldn't really help registering it. After that, the close-up on the baby looked less "hel-lo handsome" and more "I will devour your soul!"

Seriously, just try dubbing that ubiquitous Dun Dun DUNNN! musical sting over the close-up and see how well it works.
permalink
at 15:52 on 14-02-2012, Arthur B
Jacob's facial expression didn't register on me because I was in shock that the directors actually attempted to make a newborn baby do a "hel-lo handsome" facial expression.
permalink
at 15:00 on 14-02-2012, Robinson L
Arthur: Oh god, they're actually doing it. They're actually using the whole werewolf/baby love affair plot point from Breaking Dawn in the movie.

I dunno, from the graphic, it looks more like Jacob's just realized that baby is the antichrist.

But yeah, I'm feeling a significant amount of morbid curiosity to see how they're going to try to get around the whole massive creepiness factor. My prediction: whatever they do, it won't be enough.
permalink
at 12:26 on 14-02-2012, Andy G
Wow and I felt bad enough for the makers of the final Harry Potter film being straitjacketed into the ridiculous plot of the book ... though I'm almost quite curious to go watch it and see how they at least attempt not to make it utterly ridiculous.
permalink
at 19:44 on 12-02-2012, Arthur B
Oh god, they're actually doing it. They're actually using the whole werewolf/baby love affair plot point from Breaking Dawn in the movie.
permalink
at 19:31 on 10-02-2012, valse de la lune
I adore how Bakker fails to engage the person who brings up "uh one of your female characters forgives and falls in love with her rapist, wtf?"
permalink
at 19:16 on 10-02-2012, valse de la lune
Lol, on the edge of publishing oblivion. Goodness, I should like to hope so.

The people fellating him are something. "Oh, let's infantilize women, that'll get people open to the idea of equality!" Where did these clowns crawl out from?
permalink
at 16:37 on 10-02-2012, Arthur B
Update on the Bakker thing. Apparently he's aware that he's alienating potential readers, to the point where his agent is taking him to task about the blog, and at points he really does feel like he's the pretentious fraud people say he is, and he reckons his books would probably sell better and his family wouldn't be poor if there weren't these issues with the content turning people off.

So he's going to keep plugging away doing what he's doing and hope for a "Hollywood ending".
permalink
at 07:18 on 10-02-2012, Arthur B
Oh wow, Double Fine has Ron Gilbert onboard this project too? Sign me up.
permalink
at 03:02 on 10-02-2012, Ibmiller
Frank - no, Grossman's "The Magicians" does not get better. It gets worse. And yet, I read the sequel. Which is also worse.

Schafer - wow. I just hope this game becomes at least fractionally as successful as Minecraft.
permalink
at 00:19 on 10-02-2012, Axiomatic
The subject under discussion

So has anyone been following the Tim Schafer kickstarter?

For those not 'in the know', he's a video game designer who did stuff like Maniac Mansion, Monkey Island, Day of the Tentacle, Full Throttle and Grim Fandango. And he wants to make a point-and-click adventure game.

But everyone knows that's a dead genre, and no publisher will ever give you money to make one! So Schafer makes a kickstarter, and asks for $400,000 to be pledged in 33 days in order to make this game.

It has now been 24 hours since that happened.

26,690 BACKERS, $1,026,341 PLEDGED OF $400,000 GOAL, 32 DAYS TO GO

FUCK YESSSSSSS
permalink
at 16:19 on 09-02-2012, Arthur B
Why is the man so fond of repeating himself.

Because he believes if he loses over and over and over again bit by bit he'll win over 1% of the audience each time and save us all from the Semantic Apocalypse.
permalink
at 15:51 on 09-02-2012, valse de la lune
But didn't he already do that when he declared SOCIAL EXPERIMENT? Why is the man so fond of repeating himself.

Maybe that's why his books are all doorstoppers.
permalink
at 14:01 on 09-02-2012, Arthur B
It's a bit more nuanced than that - he's saying he lost, but that was his plan all along, so really he wins!
permalink
at 13:37 on 09-02-2012, valse de la lune
So what he's saying is... "I WIN! Because I say so"?

Elodie's little story must have touched a nerve, there.
permalink
at 07:56 on 09-02-2012, Arthur B
R. Scott Bakker declares victory, because the whole argument only proves correct his argument that people's worldviews set them up for confirmation bias. Except, of course, his own worldview, which is exempt from that because he is a philosophical nomad and totally isn't just buying into a fairly fringe group worldview centring around apocalyptic-transhumanist takes on neuroscience, oh no. He's the genuine individual who's transcended all that, it's everyone else who's the rube.
permalink
at 02:19 on 09-02-2012, Michal
Hey folks, remember back during the first Text Factor when the ferrets talked about how silly a reality show based around books would be (but did something similar anyway)?

Well, I just realized Canada Reads ("the battle of the books") is exactly that. One panellist was almost crying yesterday when she spoke about why she voted off a particular book. There's a live studio audience and everything.
permalink
at 09:21 on 08-02-2012, Arthur B
But is he going to blame Nick for criticising his online behaviour, or is he going to blame you for poisoning Nick's mind with your women's magic?
permalink
at 07:32 on 08-02-2012, valse de la lune
Nick Mamatas is linking his posts calling them meltdowns. This is going to drive Bakker to a whole new height of rage--he seems to find it most grievous when other men disapprove of him. Like he's being betrayed by his fellow men, who by all rights should be rallying to him in the face of angry feminists.

"IF THAT ONE BITCH HAD JUST LIKED MY BOOK SIX MONTHS AGO," indeed.
permalink
at 22:20 on 07-02-2012, Arthur B
Double post because the more I look at this:

He's going to go all Dave Sim next

the more apt it seems. From what I remember of The Prince of Nothing - which is admittedly very little - there's points where it has the same sort of fever dream quality to it that Cerebus did from High Society until the point where I stopped reading (three guesses where that was).
permalink
at 21:10 on 07-02-2012, Arthur B
Well, valse, if you were just trolling that'd be one hell of a result. 1 post to generate six months of hilarious rage? Devastating victory.
permalink
at 21:09 on 07-02-2012, Janne Kirjasniemi
With the exception that he hasn't really made anything worthwhile to simmify from. Also points for having hit... something with that post.
permalink