Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.
I’m not comparing a woman to a book, I’m comparing two different types of infatuation.
The crush you feel for a girl you don’t really know and the attachment you feel toward a book you read in high school fall pretty firmly into the same category. They’re both intensely personal, one-sided experiences.
YES, they are, except one of them is a profoundly offensive intensely personal, one-sided experience...
I am sad :/
Also, no intention of making Pat the new Mr Bakker, and sorry if it sounds like I hypocritically am ... just ... err ... lettin' off steam :(
You know that it’s going to be like? It’s going to be like wandering onto an internet porn site and seeing a video of a girl I had a crush on in high school. You probably knew someone like her. The smart girl. The shy girl. The one who wore glasses and was a little socially awkward. The one who screwed up the curve in chemistry so you got an A- instead of an A.
God, girls are so shit. First they won't sleep with you, then they suck at chemistry, and then they have sex with people not you. It must be so hard being Patrick Rothfuss...
Sorry I don't mean to randomly bitch at the guy but siiiiiigh.
(He manages to invoke the madonna/whore stereotype when talking about movie adaptations of the Hobbit of all things.)
What exactly is she doing writing introductions to Pride and Prejudice, anyway?
OK, so I'll admit it: I saw the movie first... But, as I had discovered from reading Peter Benchley's book Jaws, sometimes there are scenes in the book that aren't in the movie... The movies always leave something out. Which is what makes Pride and Prejudice such a joy to read over and over. Because you can make up your own movie about it -- in your head.
(I can't stop laughing at this)
The filthy treacherous xenos.
I don't remember much about the plot now except that there wasn't much of one, but they were on this planet to do... stuff and there are Chaos Marines and... stuff
That should totally be the strapline for the movie.
Ultramarine: There Are Chaos Marines and Stuff
The movie Beyond the Black Rainbow, a movie I have been very interested in, has finally got itself an American distributor, though there's still no word on if/when/where it will appear in theaters (or if it will ever appear in Canada). There is a new trailer, though.
This movie is so Seventies they had to make it in 2010 because the Seventies couldn't contain it.
Yep, the choice of maps is fantastic.
I was especially pleased (and surprised) to see the map from The Phantom Tollbooth featured so prominently, I spent a lot of time as a kid studying that map. It's still one of my favorite children's books, and still stands up today.
I have started reading the cartography article, but am intimidated by the literarytheoriness of it and keep giving up.
Aw, the literarytheoriness was one reason I liked the article so much.
I have a passing interest in the history of cartography, and I am (like Nicholas) surprised that no one's done a full scholarly monograph on the fictional maps. I really love the idea of maps in fantasy novels that somehow reflect the culture that may have produced them. That ties right into the Yggdrasil point, too, in that fantasy maps need not conform to our own expectation of what a map "is", and can be read as their own texts (what's emphasized? What's not? And All That) beyond their function as representing the geography of some imaginary place.
I just didn't have any responses to it beyond "buh pretty pictures".
Yep, the choice of maps is fantastic. (There are some terribly bad fantasy maps out there, after all, that fail at both an artistic and practical level)
The Yggdrasil point I also thought was very sound.
Yes, I liked that part too. Gene Wolfe's Wizard Knight series has that sort of 'cosmology map' at the beginning, and coincidentally enough those books draw heavily on Norse mythology.
@Valse: I'm intrigued. Could you expand on that, or is it just Generically Bad?
In fairness I think the point about ambiguity slash room for interpretation is a very strong one that's undervalued. Maps can tend to constrain your imagination in terms of the book, and reduce the sense of being limited to the characters' knowledge, and they do increase the likelihood of plot holes. Also they tend to make geographers cry. The Yggdrasil point I also thought was very sound.