Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.
at 14:56 on 09-04-2015
That's a really great video, Alasdair, thanks for linking! I personally don't really like the FPS genre, but the video is thoughtful, interesting, and well presented (only complaint is that it feels more like a really nice radio lecture than a video, since I watched while doing other things, and whenever I would pay more attention to the video itself, it rarely had anything but a tangential connection to the words I was hearing. But that's a really tiny complaint, since as a radio lecture, it's phenomenal).
at 02:54 on 07-04-2015
, Alasdair Czyrnyj
When I woke up this morning, I never thought I'd end the day by saying "boy, that was an insightful and compelling two-hour video about the evolution of the Call of Duty
franchise that actually has me reconsidering some of my prejudices."
And yet, here we are
at 15:30 on 01-04-2015
, Robinson L
Right, I didn't want to suggest I think it's unproblematic, and you raise some excellent points; but as you say, it was affecting and powerful, despite the problems. I agree with you that the ending was especially moving - personally, I spent at least the last 10 minutes or so wondering how they were going to pull off a conclusion which felt appropriate to the tone, and I wasn't expecting anything on the order of what it delivered.
at 11:36 on 01-04-2015
, Andy G
I also found Pride to be affecting and it's certainly a powerful story, but I did have some reservations. I found the heart-warming British comedy style to be slightly by-the-numbers and also sat uncomfortably with the radical nature of the story; I thought the generic teenage coming-out-story character they invented was superfluous and would have preferred to see more of Mark Ashton; it seemed to spend a lot more time establishing how homophobic the miners were rather than concentrating on the politics (this central conflict was not historically grounded); and for a film about gay pride there was an almost total absence of sexuality or sexual desire. I should stress that I did somehow still find it powerful, especially the end, despite these problems.
at 22:30 on 31-03-2015
, Robinson L
My sisters and I watched Pride
last night along with my dad and his significant other. I don't think I'll be able to write a review, as it would probably just consist of me gushing about the film. We all loved it. I mean, I'm a sucker for stories about oppressed groups coming together despite their differences in solidarity and mutual support (in this case, gay activists and striking mine workers in the 1980s). But it's also incredibly well-executed, with numerous touching and/or funny moments. And despite the grim nature of the context (which the film acknowledges), it's mostly positive and upbeat, which as one of my sisters pointed out, is very rare for a mainstream gay film.
... So yeah, all-in-all, great movie.
at 15:59 on 31-03-2015
I just read Jo Walton's "The Just City," and really enjoyed it. Perhaps because my high school reading of "The Republic" was mostly me railing at how horrible the Noble Lie is and how annoying Plato's Socrates was with all his yes-men. Walton's Republic (on Atlantis!) (with robots and time travel and actual Greek gods!) is full of well-intentioned folk who are very much like the yes men in Plato's book, but then Sokrates (spelling in the book) is magically whisked there by Athene (ditto) and promptly sets about actually questioning the assumptions of the city. It does end extremely abruptly, plot-wise, though thematically I thought it was pretty great, and it's the first in a trilogy, so hopefully the dangling threads will be caught up in the summer.
at 15:12 on 29-03-2015
, Arthur B
I guess some of those do straddle genre lines, but it's interesting how many people think that genres are a mutually exclusive one-label-only thing.
My rule of thumb in such situations is to tell people that picking a costume they like and are enthusiastic about is more important than strict adherence to theme anyway. :D
at 14:14 on 29-03-2015
, Andy G
I've had a quite interesting experience in testing the limits of genre recently. I've invited friends to a "science fiction and fantasy" themed costume party, which I thought was fairly self-explanatory, but I've been surprised by how many people were completely flummoxed about what counts as sci-fi or fantasy and have been messaging me requesting clarification. Queries have included: Harry Potter? Peter Pan? Wizard of Oz? Power Rangers? Transformers? "Computer game characters"? X-Men? Ghostbusters? Frozen?
at 16:07 on 17-03-2015
, Jules V.O.
In more Pratchett memorial news, my sister Noria shared this picture with me recently, which she described as "the saddest adorable thing ever." I think it's an accurate description.This is the one
that got me.
at 15:30 on 16-03-2015
, Robinson L
In more Pratchett memorial news, my sister Noria shared this picture
with me recently, which she described as "the saddest adorable thing ever." I think it's an accurate description.
@Arthur: That's a beautiful sentiment, I hope you're right.
@Cheriola: That's sweet, thanks for sharing. And this part:
he must have been the most effective teacher of secular humanist ethics of our age
Totally agree. When I first went to undergrad and started studying philosophy (about seven years ago, now) my dad asked me at one point who my favorite philosopher was, and I can't remember which one of us said it anymore, but one put forward Terry Pratchett. I really do think he was a philosophical writer par excellence, even if I did find myself disagreeing with him on more and more points as time progressed. A couple years after that conversation with my dad, I was at a con panel on "The Philosophy of Discworld," where you had this guy talking about all this interesting philosophical ideas he found in the Discworld series, and I mostly remembering thinking just 'Yeah, that's about right.'
... And I also found his books immensely fun, which is hardly ever the case for me when it comes to Great Works of Literature.
Also interesting reading of "Bonnie & Clyde." I may have to check it out, for research on asexual characters if nothing else.
Interesting: I agree that Perceval is definitely asexual, but I read Rein as emphatically not interested in male-bodied people at all, to the point where she only had sex with the intersex character in spite of their male-bodied characteristics. It has been a couple of years since I read the book, though.
at 20:27 on 15-03-2015
, Arthur B
I don’t know if I should be glad that he passed peacefully and apparently before his condition got unbearable mentally, or be sad that he didn’t get to make his stand on the issue of assisted suicide as he had planned.
Unless we hear anything to the contrary I'm choosing to take that as a sign that, despite the struggles of his condition, it never quite hit the point where the "dignified exit" route outweighed what joys he still had in life.
at 21:53 on 14-03-2015
Argh, that's supposed to say "T.E. Lawrence", of course. I always get him mixed up with D.H. Lawrence...
at 21:49 on 14-03-2015
Also, weirdly, have a look at the 1967 movie “Bonnie and Clyde”, even if that movie apparently was considered very racy for its time.
Explanation, for the sake of not cluttering up the playpen even more, to be found here: http://notes.io/DHT
at 21:22 on 14-03-2015
Oh, by the way, as far as I remember, there were one or two other asexual people on this board. You might want to check out the novel “Dust” by Elizabeth Bear. It’s a kind of mash-up between “run-down generation ship populated by transhuman mutants” type scifi and Arthurian-style chivalrous romance. The characterizations and plot are a bit thin (in keeping with the style of medieval heroic questing epics, I suppose), but the interesting world building makes up for it. One of the two protagonists is asexual – and I don’t mean, “she doesn’t have a sex scene, so I can headcanon her that way”, I mean the character clearly states that she doesn’t want to have sex with her love interest because she’s “fallow” and no, she’s not going to change that part of her herself (she could - transhumanism) just because her beloved is horny. The other protagonist seems to be pansexual with a stated preference for cis women, though the only sex scene in the book is a brief “you’re hot, so why not?” kind of fling between her and an intersex person who identifies mostly as male. The asexuality of the first protagonist seems to be there partly to avoid squick (the protagonists who fall in love are genetically half-sisters, even if they never met before the beginning of the book), and partly for the sake of mythological allusion (the asexual character is a ‘knight errant’ named Ser Percival), but still, it’s the best intentional depiction of my sexuality / gender combination that I’ve ever seen. Not that there’s much competition, of course.
at 21:17 on 14-03-2015
I just read the news, and I actually shed a few tears. Never did that before for a person I’ve never met. But I’m one of those readers on whom his books had a lot of influence in terms of worldview and values, having gotten to them at an early teenage age, but at a point when the series had already moved on from the early fantasy parodies to social commentary. (I swear, he must have been the most effective teacher of secular humanist ethics of our age. I mean, how many people will read a dry philosophical treatise? But sneak it into an entertaining story and season it with humour, and you can reach a whole generation or two.) And like Robinson, I was still waiting for every new book, even if a few of the latest ones didn’t quite work for me. Still, “Good Omens”, “Small Gods” and “Monstrous Regiment” will always be among my Top 10 books, and I don’t remember actively disliking any of his books that I’ve read. It probably also doesn’t help that he always reminded me a bit of my father (passed away some 15 years ago), in both looks and general attitude. So it kind of feels like I lost a distant, but wise and entertaining uncle.
Though it wasn’t just the ethical education, or even the fact that listening to the audiobooks for the 5th time reliably helps me distract myself during phases of bad depression and anxiety, but also that he was so refreshingly uninterested in romance subplots. He may never have identified any of his characters as asexual / aromantic (or have any other non-hetero characters until rather recently), but there were quite a few major characters and protagonists who simply showed no interest, or were completely oblivious, or were just plain too busy for any kind of romance. And even the books with romance subplots kept that part to a minimum or snarked about it. In a world where all other authors apparently have to establish their male protagonists as NOT A VIRGIN and always ready to judge the attractiveness of any woman they meet, and books with female protagonists apparently can’t do without one or more love interests to swoon over, and where all the spares have to be paired up in the end, just breaking that mold on a regular basis is already worth a lot. I’m grateful that I had some 30-odd Discworld and other novels to go through as a teenager, long before I knew asexuality was a thing and that I wasn’t alone. His sheer productivity as an author managed to balance out everything else I read, and helped me feel… normal. (It’s not that I don’t enjoy a good romance subplot. I do. The problem of erasure comes in if there are never any teenage or adult characters who don’t fall in love or have a string of affairs.)
I don’t know if I should be glad that he passed peacefully and apparently before his condition got unbearable mentally, or be sad that he didn’t get to make his stand on the issue of assisted suicide as he had planned. (One of my grandmothers had Alzheimer’s – I don’t have any memories of her as anything but in a basically vegetative state. My mother has told me years ago that she’s planning on committing suicide if she ever gets diagnosed. That’s not legal in my country either, though.)
I’m mostly just sad that the world (and his family) was robbed of this brilliant human far too early.
“So much universe, and so little time,” indeed.
at 10:10 on 14-03-2015
I haven't read any Pratchett for years, but what I realised this week was that I've still read more books by him than any other author,
This is true for me as well, although I admit I haven't read nearly as many of his books as Andy.
Truthfully, I think the only other author whose works affected me as deeply as Pratchett's was Gore Vidal. Despite not having kept up with the Discworld of late, I'm very, very sad to see him go.
at 16:59 on 13-03-2015
, Andy G
I feel very close to your own thoughts, Arthur. I haven't read any Pratchett for years, but what I realised this week was that I've still read more books by him than any other author, at least 40, maybe 50. What a lot of people have said, and I I feel exactly the same way, is that they were very strongly influenced by him in terms of their development of their reading tastes and ways of thinking about things. Personally, I always felt drawn mostly to the fantastical and wistful side to his writing rather than the humour, though he is mostly being remembered as a humourist. Even though it's been a while since I felt drawn to read him, I do feel really grateful for all the entertaining and thought-provoking reading he gave me over the years.
at 21:06 on 12-03-2015
Sad news indeed. He'll be sorely missed.
at 18:36 on 12-03-2015
, Robinson L
His final tweets are ... eminently appropriate.
I'll be posting a memorial piece on my livejournal later today, but I want to say here that I, for one, am still deeply immersed in my Pratchett phase more than a decade on, and most of my family are the same. I find his more recent works increasingly hit and miss, but that his hits were still top notch.
I don't have any "helped me through a dark place" stories relating to Pratchett, but I have a lot of fond memories reading him or listening to audiobooks together with family. And for myself - only a tiny handful of authors have managed to hook me into their stories to the same level as Pratchett, or even come close.
Many tears, and even more love.
at 16:46 on 12-03-2015
, Arthur B
Terry Pratchett is dead. My thoughts as posted elsewhere:
Confession: It's been a long time since I've actually read any Pratchett. Was avidly, deeply into his work during my teenage years though and they helped me get through that with my sanity intact.
What I find impressive about his work in retrospect, though, is how everyone has their own cross-section of Pratchett: I have my own idea of when his work really starts to grip me, which my favourite of his books are, and when I found things starting to get over-worn and repetitive. So do most people who've read him.
At the same time, exactly where we put those markers varies immensely, and I'm sure there's readers out there who and there'll be people who think Pratchett only really started speaking to them in the last few years. The only conclusion is that it isn't a matter of Pratchett declining as an author so much as individuals getting what they needed from him as readers, and then growing apart, because neither author nor reader were standing still.
I don't have a single regret for my Pratchett phase - I don't even regret that it ended, because it was time. But I do envy those who are still going through theirs, and those who have yet to begin them.
RIP Terry, and sorry for bringing so many books to the signing.
at 23:37 on 05-03-2015
, Jamie Johnston
Could be because the axes on the graphs didn't have proper values marked. Lack of scientific rigour is severely punished round here. ;)