Playpen

Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.

at 21:24 on 07-04-2014, Tamara
Sleepy Hollow is silly, frantic fun, but also has just enough built political subtexts to not exhaust my interest after three episodes the way this sort of thing usually does, although I did lose attention by the end of the season. Maybe I should try Reign...
permalink
at 17:21 on 07-04-2014, Kit
Genevieve Valentine singlehandedy got me to watch two incredibly cheesy shows (*mumblemumble*Sleepy Hollow*mumble*Reign), simply because her reviews were delightful and I wanted to know what was going on. I've read a couple of short stories and liked them, but maybe I should give Mechanique a try!
permalink
at 11:18 on 07-04-2014, Tamara
I'm sure it wouldn't traumatize you! Well, I think...I mean, it has a little bit of a horror aesthetic, I guess, but it's much more melancholy and surreal than anything really nasty. Unless you have serious issues with fear of falling or non-linear storytelling, possibly.
permalink
at 10:29 on 07-04-2014, Adrienne
Tamara,

I would love to read Mechanique, but unfortunately as far as I can tell (from reading a couple of Valentine's short stories set in the same milieu) it would traumatize me a LOT. I do point my friends who like steampunk at it, though. Agreed that she needs more love as a fiction writer.

But gawd, do I love her criticism, both the silly and the serious. (She does these fabulous bad movie reviews over at her blog that are pee-your-pants funny.)
permalink
at 08:48 on 07-04-2014, Tamara
Valentine seems to be writing good commentary stuff everywhere lately, but I wish she would get more love as an author - Mechanique is a strange, interesting novel that actually uses it's steampunk aesthetic in a critical, novel way. I wish there was more discussion of it around.
permalink
at 06:51 on 07-04-2014, James D
Re: Brian Cox vs. Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal, I agree completely. Hopkins is obviously more intense, but what makes Brian Cox better in my opinion is that he seems so innocuous at first, just a tubby middle-aged man of the sort you see dozens of every day. He sort of blusters with Will Graham for a while and then very casually asks for his address so he can write him, which seems like the most natural thing in the world - except of course he really just wants to pass it along to Dolarhyde so he can kill Graham and his family. It's that kind of dark intent behind seemingly harmless pleasantries that makes for a villain more in keeping with Hannibal's overall narrative, i.e. someone who for years fooled Will Graham, a highly successful hunter of serial killers.

In The Silence of the Lambs, just from the very first instant you see Hopkins standing there in his cell, he has this incredible intensity that makes for a compelling character but a very poor disguise. I guess you could argue that he hid his true nature before and now that he's caught, he no longer needs to maintain the charade, but that just feels flimsy to me.
permalink
at 04:49 on 07-04-2014, Kit
Oh, Genevieve Valentine is amazing - I've only skimmed that one article because I have yet to see the movie or the show and don't want to be spoiled too much, but the parts I read are excellent.

Also, this has nothing to do with the previous discussion, parts of which have been delighting my little anarcho-marxist heart, and have led to a few additions to my to-read list (thanks for that!); but, emboldened by the fact that I strangely enjoyed The Woman in White back when the TeXt Factor practically forced me to read it, I have decided to pick up No Name. Now that I'm halfway through, I'm steadily developing the same kind of weird fondness for it I had for its predecessor, and I'm starting to wonder what the ferretcrew would have had to say about it. The characters are weaker - it hasn't got its Marian, or Count Fosco, for that matter - but there's still plenty to latch on. So far it has delivered
sisterly love in spades (does Collins have a fetish for sisters fervently declaring their affection for one another?), an incredibly wet love interest (who gets constantly dismissed as a complete waste of space by none other than his own delightfully cynical father), another slightly-mannish-but-gorgeous protagonist, the creepiest housekeeper ever (who is made even creepier by the fact that she is incredibly normal and chillingly sane), lots and lots of ominous capitalisation ("He is a Scoundrel!" *gasp*), weird ninja-y infiltration schemes involving completely ludicrous disguises, a Victorian shopping addict (I'm serious), a page-long discussion on how to make omelettes (yup, still serious) and a Toad in an Aquarium (also randomly capitalised).
I'm kind of sad not to have a group of people I can discuss it with chapter by chapter.
permalink
at 04:37 on 07-04-2014, Arthur B
Clarice's story gets very problematic (and very silly, as does everyone else's plotlines) in the Lambs sequel but I always thought her story in Lambs was more interesting than Will Graham's in Manhunter precisely because, as Genevieve points out, she's an untested factor who spends the movie proving herself, whereas Will Graham put away Hannibal, and frankly next to Hannibal most of the other serial killers Harris offers up are rank amateurs so where's the challenge to the Guy Who Caught Lecter?

I think Manhunter is the better movie, but mostly because I'm a partisan for Brian Cox's interpretation of Lecter and Michael Mann's direction, both of which veer back from the horror movie melodrama that Hopkins/John Demme used for Lambs. Graham is an interesting character in that mainly because Michael Mann does a masterful job of playing with the idea of how psychological profiling and police procedure is just as much a form of manhunting as serial killing is, albeit from a position of insight and empathy and understanding and rationality as opposed to coming from an irrational place which doesn't understand why it's doing what it's doing and struggles to relate to the world outside of itself (see, for instance, Graham's ability to empathise with Dolarhyde and get inside his head whilst retaining his outrage at what he's done, compared with Dolarhyde's utter misinterpretation of a moment he witnesses with his girlfriend when he decides she's Like All The Others and needs to die and the way he doesn't actually give two shits about his victims because they're just a means to an end for him).

But Clarice has a better story arc and can basically do more or less anything Will does and I'm a little sad that Mann and Cox didn't come back for the sequel. If nothing else, it's slightly too easy for Clarice to retain her "don't trust Lecter 100% instincts" when he's Anthony Hopkins chewing the scenery to an extent where he may as well be dressed as Dracula with a DON'T TRUST ME sign about his neck, whereas if he were Brian Cox turning on the charm he uses to effortlessly steer Will Graham's family into mortal peril in Manhunter, well, that'd be something to see.
permalink
at 23:13 on 06-04-2014, Adrienne
Genevieve Valentine is over at Strange Horizons being very, very smart and engaging about a famous movie and a related TV show -- but not just about those things; also about how we think about female characters, and female virtues, and what's "interesting" to watch. Of probable interest to a lot of Ferretbrainers.
permalink
at 23:04 on 06-04-2014, Melanie
But on the other hand, you don't get that many books about the time period.


If you're up for some nonfiction, I found Newton and the Counterfeiter really gripping and enjoyable.
permalink
at 18:33 on 06-04-2014, Michal
But on the other hand, you don't get that many books about the time period. Hmm...

Try Salamander by Thomas Wharton instead. It's a heckuvalot shorter, and has automatons in it.
permalink
at 15:31 on 06-04-2014, Dan H
I have just started watching Starz' Treasure Island prequel Black Sails and when this inspired me to do some cursory pirate research, I was interested to note that in 2010 Forbes compiled a list of highest earning pirates.
permalink
at 08:33 on 06-04-2014, Janne Kirjasniemi
Hmm... based on this input, I think I'll go with either Snow Crash or Cryptonomicon. That Baroque cycle thing looks to be interesting for many good and bad reasons, but I'm afraid that reading historical fiction of a somewhat familiar time period might be either very rewarding or endlessly frustrating. I don't know whether I dare to take a chance. That feud setup between Newton and Leibniz and getting some random dude to settle it from the colonies sounds a bit of a stretch already. But on the other hand, you don't get that many books about the time period. Hmm...
permalink
at 06:58 on 06-04-2014, Tamara
Dunno - Stephenson really very good at the underlying craftsmanship of writing, I think. Pace, structure and particularly plot are usually very well put together (barring the OMG it's 3000 pages long!!! of the Baroque and the slogging in Anathem. Maybe he's getting worse.) That's where Mieville tends to fall down, in my book. (Neither of them are that good at characterization.) I don't find Mieville preachy though, nor with Stephenson's patronizing streak. (It may be that I simply don't mind ideology in my fiction but find Stephenson's milquetoast obnoxious but Mieville's at least occasionaly interesting.)
permalink
at 00:31 on 06-04-2014, James D
I think you can draw a lot of parallels between Neal Stephenson and China Mieville, in that they're both kind of manic and love creating weird, intriguing settings filled with cool tidbits, but both also let their worst tendencies get out of hand sometimes, which leads to slogging through pages and pages of them explaining this idea which they clearly think is really really cool but actually isn't that hot. Also both tend to focus more on style and less on substance, and both dabble in lots of different genres. Both seem to fancy themselves allies/feminists/minority warriors" of sorts, but tend to trip up on that fairly often.

Not sure how relevant that is, but it just struck me how many things in this conversation could be applied to Mieville and his books as well.
permalink
at 23:56 on 05-04-2014, Arthur B
The Barqoue Cycle contains one of the worst sex scenes I've ever read, so it might be worth looking at just for that...

As I mentioned in my review of the 40% of the Baroque Cycle I could actually stand to read, I found it to be increasingly dull and preoccupied with some sort of agenda which Stephenson never set out clearly enough for me to be entirely comfortable with.

If you're thinking of the sex scene I'm thinking of, there's some discussion of it in the comments.
permalink
at 21:36 on 05-04-2014, Tamara
A snobbish discussion of the autism spectrum at location 218. I may quit this now.
permalink
at 21:05 on 05-04-2014, Tamara
The very first scene of Stepehenson's Reamde is men firing guns on a prairie, it turns out. Oh dear.
permalink
at 18:58 on 05-04-2014, Michal
Journey across the ice.
permalink
at 18:28 on 05-04-2014, Tamara
Why Left Hand of Darkness?
permalink
at 16:32 on 05-04-2014, Michal
I dunno, my opinion on Anathem is that if you've already read A Canticle for Liebowitz and The Left Hand of Darkness then you've already read the good parts of Anathem. The rest see-saws between ludicrous and boring.

The Barqoue Cycle contains one of the worst sex scenes I've ever read, so it might be worth looking at just for that...
permalink
at 15:39 on 05-04-2014, Tamara
I think I actually read The Diamond Age of his stuff first. I don't remember how accessible it is though...Anathem has got some fascinating bits, but it also has some terribly boring, indulgent stuff and lacks the verve of Cryptonomicon or Snow Crash. I'd start with one of those, I think.

Actually, now I want to go read Reamde. Somehow I'm suddenly in the mood for Stephenson. Life, eh?
permalink
at 11:16 on 05-04-2014, Janne Kirjasniemi
I've been meaning to read Stephenson for ages, since he seems to be sort of influential and apparently a good writer as well. At least the Wire article where he wrote about the cables being installed around the world was interesting. What would be a good book to start with? Anathema has interested me somewhat, as I've understood that there is some stuff about the whole nominalis vs. universalism stuff there, Cryptonomicon is about WWII and cryptography, both of these subjects having a baseline interestingness about them. With some wackiness handling anonymous banking? Well, he sems to have a knack of picking interesting subjects, is what I mean. Any recommendations? I do like the Baroque as well...
permalink