Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.
Unlike Robert E Howard's racism, a lot of Lovecraft's racism is almost too goofy to take seriously.Oh, I dunno, maybe this century's Lovecraft would just have been a Birther ;-)
Also in the realm of small victories, I submitted this bug report about sexism last week, and got an awesome response from the project maintainers: https://t.co/qBHiszWC
Come to think of it, a product of miscegenation like Obama getting elected would probably drive Lovecraft himself to insanity, if he were around today.
Though I suppose it's lucky nobody asked Howie about inter-racial dating.
Internet snark at its most sublime.
God, bring on the future where every household can have a Michael Fassbender.
In related news, I'm over halfway through The Bloody Red Baron and I'm not really grooving to it the way I did with Anno Dracula. Part of it is that the plot and setting aren't really coming together sharp enough to keep me excited, and part of it is the fact that I've already seen most of the tricks Newman is using before in the first book. On reflection, AD was a quintessential "just go with this setup, okay?" type of novel, and that's a type of novel that doesn't lend itself well to expansion and sequels.
I'm also feeling like Newman's holding back a bit. I just finished a part where we've caught up to flying ace Albert Ball (real person) who, thanks to being caught in a plane crash in No Man's Land and having vampiric regenerative powers, has become something resembling an ambulatory steer carcass with a flight suit half-melted into it. It was gross, but it didn't hit the level of true horror of seeing something so horribly mutilated yet still alive, something I feel could have only been done by going (forgive the pun) completely over the top with the description. Come to think of it, overblown description isn't always a bad thing; as Houellebecq pointed out, it's one of the ways Lovecraft's stories get their primal power.
I'm also feeling a bit unhappy about Newman's treatment of the Germans (and most everyone from Middle/Eastern Europe) in the AD books. There was quite a bit of sneering and pointing out of the Ruritanianess of the vampires in the first book, but I vaguely rationalized it by arguing such sentiments were a logical development of his worldbuilding (Dracula brought all his cronies from Darkest Wallachia when he became Lord Protector, so naturally there'd be a lot of Eastern European vampires in positions of power for British people to resent) and also by unhappily accepting that such sentiments would be an integral problem of Newman's premise, as the desire to reference fictional vampires would naturally result in a lot of characters being borrowed from works written at the same time as Dracula (a time of anti-Semitic and slavophobic sentiment in Britain) and from works inspired by Dracula (which just brings the same problem back up again). Now in TBRB, we've got Dracula running Germany in WWI, so now we've got the anti-German sentiments of WWI stories thrown into the mix (as well as a curious lack of discussion or sympathy for the Germans as they endure the weird and terrible things Dracula is doing to their society in the manner we saw for the British in AD), and I'm not really liking it. I don't think I'm really arguing against this out of a Minority Warrior position; I'm just tired of Germany and Eastern Europe being used as a continual punching bag.
I'm still liking it better than Scott Westerfeld's books, though.
If you haven't done so yet: Don't. Seriously: Don't. What bland, boring, bloodless piece of turgid prose. Dialogues full of 'thous' and 'thees'. Long, rambling tracts on scientific matters as seen in the 17th century. A plot that moves at a pace that is beyond glacial. Any good idea (and there are a few) is buried under page upon page of sheer, unadultarated dreariness. The "riveting" blurb surely means that reading the book is like having rivets shot into your face.
The entire book gives me a good idea how Kim Stanley Robinson would tackle a vampire novel. I can't bring myself to read more than ten to twenty pages at a time and then I need to read another book to avoid a case of terminal tedium.
As far as 'scientific' vampire stories are concerned, I'll stick with Richard Matheson's I Am Legend.
Rami was suggesting taking the discussion offline, so I thought that one option to keep things collaborative but avoid filling the Playpen would be for him or Kyra to start an "article" about the revamp in general. "Ferretbrain is having a revamp!" You know, like newspapers have guff about their New Shiny Format! only less insufferable. Then people like you with suggestions or ideas could comment on it, other people could lurk or ignore as they like, and for a bonus there's an easily-accessible set of revamping-thoughts gathered in one handy place.
So what I meant last post was, Rami or Kyra would be the best person to write a quick article about what they're doing, because they're doing it. I could do it, but would have no idea what to write. You may not have article-making privilege yet so you probs can't. Does that make any more sense..? *hopeful worried face*
But of course if Rami prefers to wash his dirty tags in private that's his privilege :)
If you want to talk technical, perhaps we should take this off the Playpen where people are doubtless bored of it?
Slightly random, but you could always start an "article" about the revamp and then people could chip in, if that seemed good to you.
If you want to talk technical, perhaps we should take this off the Playpen where people are doubtless bored of it? Drop an email to webmaster@fb and we can get a conversation going!