Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.

at 12:34 on 07-02-2012, Shim
Also, the image of you as one of the Riders of the Apocalypse is awesome, although kind of weird because I don't have a mental image of you per se, just a kind of horsebacked heap of words roaring across the landscape and making authors cry.
at 12:20 on 07-02-2012, Shim
You'll find my post about him on the very first page, possibly as third or fourth result.

Fifth for me, shortly below the poorly-edited first sentences of a post about you. Aren't you a lucky Valse to get all that illustrious attention..?
at 09:05 on 07-02-2012, Arthur B
And also you're a sign of the end times, and society will literally collapse unless people like you are "deluged with uncomfortable facts about human nature" whenever you speak up.

So, when people dogpile Bakker, it's a sign of cultural collapse, but when they dogpile you, it's the salvation of the very same culture. Riiiiiiiight.
at 08:52 on 07-02-2012, valse de la lune
Oh, it's misogynistic certainly, but never you dare suggest that: Bakker is very much of the "fear not ladies for I am R. Scott Bakker, Minority Warrior" variety. Except he's even worse than Whedon in that regard. A lot worse.

I don't think he's obsessed with me so much as obsessed with the idea that anyone, anywhere, could possibly agree with me in any way or think I have valid points--salt in the wound when it's people whom he's met in real life/people he thought were friends (unaware, I'd guess, that they don't consider him such). Bakker doesn't seem able to grasp the idea that it's no one's fault but his that people think he's a dick. There's a little thread about personality cults and how I'm some kind of cult leader, and how by impelling people to go to his blog Bakker will have broken them away from my vile enthrallment for a minute. This is a very intense circlejerk.

In the meantime? Google up "r scott bakker." You'll find my post about him on the very first page, possibly as third or fourth result.
at 07:07 on 07-02-2012, Frank
I'm about 250 of 400ish pages into Lev Grossman's The Magicians. Does it get better? It's easy to read, but it's also easy to put down so I can flip through the channels and watch one or two hours of nothing.
at 05:13 on 07-02-2012, Frank
That RSB calls you, vdll, 'Dude' when he knows you are a woman I find to be spiteful. I want to say 'misogynistic', or would that be slanderous?
at 03:03 on 07-02-2012, Arthur B
Good god, he's positively obsessed with you isn't he?

His yelling about the Criteria Question is getting downright goofy. It's like the first half of this scene before Bakker (played by John Goodman) flips out and totals someone's car.
at 00:12 on 07-02-2012, Arthur B
I like how he's all "that's what happens when you take risks", as though writing grimdark rapey fantasy wasn't the most fashionable and profitable thing to do in the fantasy brick scene at the time.

I also like that he calls you The Dude because it makes me think of psychotic R. Scott Bakker fans busting into Jeff Bridges' home to beat him up and piss on his rug, believing he's you.
at 21:40 on 06-02-2012, valse de la lune
Did you know that R. Scott Bakker's sales have dropped... and he attributes that to what he thinks are spurious charges of misogyny (which he says he's "targeted" with regularly--gee, I wonder why)? I think we're supposed to feel bad that ~his family~ is suffering economically or something, I don't know.
at 16:18 on 06-02-2012, Arthur B
I want a time machine so I can go back and see the look on the Colonel's face when he read that.
at 15:46 on 06-02-2012, Andy G
Talking of amazing letters ...
at 15:10 on 06-02-2012, Guy
Ha, awesome. I imagine at that point he was so accustomed to regarding his penis as an "object of study" that he had simply forgot that for others it might have other connotations...
at 09:48 on 06-02-2012, Arthur B
This is the most amazing waste of space I have ever seen on the BBC News website. The argument in question seems to be:
- E-mails aren't like the good old days when people communicated via handwritten letters.
- Here is an example of a handwritten flame war in which one person stepped down and acted conciliatory.
- Here are a number of examples of email flame wars in which one person stepped down and acted conciliatory.
- Here is another example of handwritten letters causing precisely the sort of kerfuffle that ill-judged e-mails can cause.
- So considering that e-mails are probably OK but people should think a little before hitting "send".

I mean, what?
at 04:33 on 05-02-2012, Alasdair Czyrnyj
Ah yes, and sometimes the game gets very confused.
at 03:42 on 05-02-2012, Alasdair Czyrnyj
From looking at a side-discussion of healing mechanics in video games, I was led to a montage of field-surgery-style healing animations from Far Cry 2 that play whenever the player is near death.

I don't know anything about this game, but I assume that the protagonist eats codine tablets like Halloween candy.
at 09:57 on 04-02-2012, Guy
Some people on a forum I frequent are currently creating a kind of experimental choose-your-own-adventure "forum thread" collaborative book-esque-thingy. Since I know some people here like gamebooks I thought I'd promote having a look (and joining in and having a go!) here, if that's OK.

Take a look.

Contributions needed! :)
at 04:31 on 04-02-2012, Sister Magpie
If somebody tried to search for books in the "white history" category, they'd be lost in less than ten seconds because there are so many of them. It's not exactly rocket science.

Or they'd get a lot of white supremist sites since usually white history's just referred to as history.
at 21:23 on 03-02-2012, Kellicat
White history doesn't need an official category because it's so predominant it doesn't need a special category. If somebody tried to search for books in the "white history" category, they'd be lost in less than ten seconds because there are so many of them. It's not exactly rocket science.
at 19:04 on 03-02-2012, Dan H
Quite a lot of the entries on that tumblr quite specifically say they don't accept that, because it isn't "officially recognised" the way Black History Month is.
at 12:42 on 03-02-2012, Axiomatic
Given that a quality of an argument is primarily based on how good a pithy quote it is, the best counterargument to any White History Month is this:

"There are eleven White History Months."
at 20:04 on 02-02-2012, Arthur B
This one is particularly special.
at 19:54 on 02-02-2012, Dan H
Looking back at that tumblr, the ones that make me most depressed are the ones that say things like "Why don't we have a White History Month, after all, white people have done *way more stuff*."
at 15:57 on 02-02-2012, Arthur B
Nah, they moved the march so as not to clash with important Men's Rights protests. The fight to allow fathers a say in abortion is clearly the most important one, after all.