Playpen

Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.

at 22:50 on 18-09-2011, Melissa G.
I'm not denying that her original paralysis was a fridging moment. It was. No question. But then they built her up as Oracle, who was amazing and awesome and kick-ass, and her paralysis did nothing to hinder that. But now they're giving her the ability to walk again because apparently Oracle isn't good enough and isn't nearly as cool as Batgirl?
permalink
at 22:45 on 18-09-2011, Arthur B
I think the character history point is where it gets stick. I mean, if she'd been introduced as Oracle, and had been Oracle all along, then yay, disabled superhero. But because she'd had a history as Batgirl, and had appearances in the comics as Batgirl, meant that what happened to her was kind of a fridge moment.
permalink
at 22:36 on 18-09-2011, Melissa G.
That's true too. Women in refrigerators and all. I just thought it was sort of insulting to imply that she needed to be able to walk to be a superhero. Especially because as Oracle, she was completely badass while Batgirl is kind of a C-list superhero.
permalink
at 20:30 on 18-09-2011, Janne Kirjasniemi
On the other hand, and it has been pointed out dozens of times, it was always curious, that Batman could grow a new spine and others escape death, but poor Barbara was tied to the chair because the Universe thought she was more interesting that way.
permalink
at 18:50 on 18-09-2011, Melissa G.
Batgirl was probably the best written one I've read so far. And then I looked down and remembered Gail Simone was the author and went, "oh, yeah, that makes sense." I'm still not pleased that Babs is walking though....
permalink
at 12:49 on 18-09-2011, Janne Kirjasniemi
Sounds nice. I've dreaded finding out how it is. If they'd just let Gail Simone decide everything, but I guess that was a bit too much to hope for.
permalink
at 20:52 on 17-09-2011, Melissa G.
Attention Ferretbrain! My roommate and I are in the process of reading the DC reboot, and you can all expect a long, overly wordy review from the both of us on our various and angry problems with it once the month is over. That is all.
permalink
at 16:18 on 16-09-2011, Shim
This gives me joy (explanation here).
permalink
at 12:17 on 16-09-2011, Arthur B
Good job, Steve. Now go talk to your buddy George, he needs an intervention and he'll listen to you.
permalink
at 01:44 on 16-09-2011, Michal
Omg, Kate Beckinsale's arse is returning to our screens in 2012! This looks awful. I can't wait.

Hey, I think I already drew a poster for that last year.
permalink
at 01:27 on 16-09-2011, Kellicat
Oh my bad! It's still somewhat similar and amusing though. In a way, it's too bad they're not named Death Eaters. The comedic potential would have been glorious.
permalink
at 22:13 on 15-09-2011, Arthur B
Death Eaters? I cannot stop laughing at this. Is this something that always been around in Underworld or is it something new that they've pulled out of their arse?

Actually, if you listen closely it's actually "Death Dealers" and they've been part of the franchise since the first movie and oh god I know too much about this shit don't I?
permalink
at 20:07 on 15-09-2011, Kellicat
Omg, Kate Beckinsale's arse is returning to our screens in 2012! This looks awful. I can't wait.


Death Eaters? I cannot stop laughing at this. Is this something that always been around in Underworld or is it something new that they've pulled out of their arse? If it's the latter, lol forever. Are they hoping to draw in Harry Potter fans by having their villains named Death Eaters?
permalink
at 14:41 on 15-09-2011, Arthur B
I can't wait for them to get around to tackling Changeling as they work their way through the White Wolf canon. Kate Beckinsale taking out a forest full of pixies with a flamethrower = money well spent.
permalink
at 14:34 on 15-09-2011, Wardog
Omg, Kate Beckinsale's arse is returning to our screens in 2012! This looks awful. I can't wait.
permalink
at 05:17 on 15-09-2011, Michal
Oh yes, I was rather happy when Mieville disintegrated Zizek. I don't know how many times I wished that would happen when I was an undergraduate. (Reading Zizek led to lots of incoherent rants on my part.)
permalink
at 05:05 on 15-09-2011, Robinson L
Michal: Anyhow, has anyone ever wondered, if China Mieville could beat up Cthulhu?

What I particularly love about that story is that you've got “dragons, ogres, demons, zombies, indescribably deformed horrors; even Gordon Ramsey” spewing from this interdimensional portal in Central London—and until Cthulhu shows up, the London Police are all like “don't worry guys, we've totally got this,” and “quickly eliminat[e] the menace before any significant damage occurs.”

I think this constitutes grounds for inducting the whole London Metropolitan police force into the 501st Legion.

The other highlight from that site (for me) would be China Mieville vs. Slavoj Zizek: Žižek: “There’s only room in this world for one poster-boy of pop-culture Marxism with a phonically difficult surname.”

Oh, and does anyone else find China Mieville vs. Fox News eerily reminiscent of the Shinra Tower mission from Final Fantasy VII?
permalink
at 19:04 on 14-09-2011, Arthur B
I wonder if it was a conscious decision on Relic's part to promote a decent female character or if it's an incidental token thing, but either way the end results so far have been good enough--I liked Adrastia--and they all dress fantastically sensibly, though of course that's par for the course for WH40K anyway.

I suppose it's an example that in a fictional context, unlike in real life, prominence matters more than ratios. 99% of the Imperial Guard characters you see in the game are dudes, but the only one you actually remember is Mira so for all intents and purposes she is the face of the IG for the game.

I can heartily recommend Space Marine and was particularly pleased that the orks are suitably orky. They're invading this world so that they can loot some Titans. Looted Titans! Joy.

Me with every other fantastic female character--and it never happens.

I suppose it's particularly hard in this case because the game's been built from the ground up to support Space Marine style mixed ranged and melee combat, whereas a game about the Guard would be way heavier on the shooting and getting into melee combat would be suicidal.

So what I'm basically saying is give Mira her own FPS and send her up against the Tau. Then I might be able to forget about Fire Warrior, and the grotesque war crimes the Imperium will order you to do will feel good and justified because seriously, fuck the Tau.
permalink
at 18:55 on 14-09-2011, valse de la lune
(Me with every other fantastic female character--and it never happens. I'd slaughter kittens to see a spin-off featuring Mazikeen from Lucifer.)
permalink
at 18:54 on 14-09-2011, valse de la lune
Arthur: I kind of hope she gets her own spin-off.

Adskhjs;lksh. That's me with every other fantastic female character.

I think she's the only female character who gets any screen time at all, mind, though there are a few others (like an assembly line worker and a hard-nosed medic) who make appearances on audio logs.

It seems to be a Relic WH40K thing? DOW2 has the governor; Retribution has Inquisitor Adrastia and I suppose the first game had a bunch of Sisters of Battle, though I never did play Soulstorm. I'm happy to hear Mira is just as good as that entry makes her out to be, which gives me some motivation to play Space Marine. (I would have, anyway, but I didn't expect anything but testosterone-charged sausagefest.) I wonder if it was a conscious decision on Relic's part to promote a decent female character or if it's an incidental token thing, but either way the end results so far have been good enough--I liked Adrastia--and they all dress fantastically sensibly, though of course that's par for the course for WH40K anyway.
permalink
at 17:37 on 14-09-2011, Wardog
Really? That's where we're taking this?

No, we're not "taking this anywhere". I, as a moderator, told you to drop this. You didn't.

Your comments show very little understanding of trans issues, and it is not our job to explain them to you. Everything you have said here simply re-iterates arguments we have heard before and are tired of hearing. You are not presenting another side to the discussion, you are derailing the discussion with irrelevance. You might as well have come in here and told us we'd all forgotten to consider what it says in The Bible.

It is not the fact that you disagree with us that is a problem, it's the nature of the disagreement. There is a world of difference between disagreeing on the appropriate way to integrate trans-children into a school community within the restrictions of the law and glibly describing young trans-men as "girls who want to be boys."

To repeat myself: this is not a discussion. It is a statement, as moderator, that this conversation is over. If can't respect that, I will ban you.
permalink
at 16:54 on 14-09-2011, Arthur B
@Gamer: I suppose I am glad that you are in fact being honest with us about what your stance is. I'm just sad that you were serious about some of the stuff you're saying. There's nothing wrong with having multiple points of view on a subject, but you've been putting forward these points of view in a way which I considered likely to offend people, and has in fact offended people. Backing away and cooling off is what's called for here.
permalink
at 16:30 on 14-09-2011, Ash
@Gamer_2k4

Do you mind dropping this conversation? I'm feeling pretty offended by the asssumptions you make.
permalink