Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.
at 02:07 on 13-09-2013
I look forward to Monster Manual being the latest Dungeons & Dragons spin-off movie.
I'd watch that. At least until the scene with the cockatrice. Then I'd just turn to stone.
at 01:19 on 13-09-2013
, Fishing in the Mud
Having lived for so long in my fictional universe, I feel very protective of it
Lord love us all.
at 00:52 on 13-09-2013
, Arthur B
Smooth move, Rowling.
Crafting Harry Potter
sidequels as effectively movie-only projects* ought to let her keep her "actually a real author whose primary literary output these days is non-Potter stuff" but also keep raking in the Potter megabucks.
* I know Fantastic Beasts
was made available as a spin-off book but so far as I'm aware it's just a bestiary and doesn't have an actual plot you could use to make a film out of, so it sounds like she's penning an all-original story for this. Unless the intent is just to film the bestiary, in which case I look forward to Monster Manual
being the latest Dungeons & Dragons
at 20:10 on 12-09-2013
, Dan H
New outrage in the mail: Foreign Woman Dares Criticize UK Government
Doesn't she realise that coming from a country that is poorer than Britain automatically disqualifies her from having any right to talk about anything?
at 14:40 on 06-09-2013
When I tried to watch that first video, I had to sit through a few seconds of a USAA ad first -- which starts out by asking questions about the USAA. So I started off with a brief bzuh? moment before I realised those weren't the hard questions in, er, question.
(The video itself was of course one long bzuh? moment, but that's another story.)
at 03:52 on 06-09-2013
LOL Yes, exactly. XD
at 03:06 on 06-09-2013
research, I believe I have an answer
to aforesaid hard questions.
at 01:57 on 06-09-2013
, Alasdair Czyrnyj
Finally, a song that asks the hard questions.CHAOS. REIGNS.
at 23:54 on 05-09-2013
It seems like he's taken a page from Larry Correia, who incessantly whinges about much the same thing.
at 21:54 on 05-09-2013
, Janne Kirjasniemi
That was quite a rant. It must be nice to be able to use terms like 'sociology', 'social democrat' and 'conservative' and whatnot and just define them in just the way you want for present purposes and just write whatever happens to come to mind and call it wisdom. And in the case of 'modern' and 'progressive' not define them at all and pretend that everybody must realize what exactly your blathering about. Apparently there is no world outside the US too. Go figure.
at 19:24 on 05-09-2013
I didn't read that commentary essay, I just idly scrolled down to the comments to see if there were counter arguments. Then I noticed... only 3 of the 50 comments come from people with recognisably female names, even though almost all commenters seem to have signed with their real names. WTF?
at 19:13 on 05-09-2013
That was charmingly incoherent.
at 17:34 on 05-09-2013
, Arthur B
If there's one good thing that came out of Scalzi's Hugo win this year, it's that the announcement sent Voxy into a flailing rage.
Even there the Hugos are kind of taking the lazy way out though - I mean, prompting Vox to rant or say something vile isn't exactly master trolling. Surely fandom can aspire to taking on less soft targets?
at 17:21 on 05-09-2013
I think the robot stories are cute, and that's about all--which isn't a bad thing considering I find most of the sf stories from the "Golden Age" fairly dull, and "cute" is a huge improvement on that. I do remember liking the Foundation trilogy a lot when I was 13, and then going on an Asimov reading binge that stopped because I didn't end up being quite so enamored by anything else I tried.
If there's one good thing that came out of Scalzi's Hugo win this year, it's that the announcement sent Voxy into a flailing rage. Very much appreciated. Meanwhile, I'm just gonna assume the award was actually a belated one for Old Man's War, because the shortlist for best novel was unusually weak all around.
at 11:36 on 05-09-2013
, Robinson L
Yeah, that's how I took the stories in I, Robot, and I enjoyed them as such - just not as much as I enjoy stories with strong characterization.
at 11:11 on 05-09-2013
, Arthur B
Asimov's robot stories are fun but you do have to take them as logic puzzles in working out how the Laws of Robotics have managed to screw up this time rather than stories that are at all interested in character.
at 10:53 on 05-09-2013
He's actually got a pretty broad range of things (within his niche); I always liked his short stories, because he's got a knack for interesting ideas and knows the science - and it also counterbalances his relative weakness in characterisation. There's quite a fun set of science-based mystery stories, for example (called Asimov's Mysteries in my version), and some decent smaller novels with adventure/mystery elements.
at 10:36 on 05-09-2013
, Robinson L
I've only read the first Foundation novel (and aside from that, only I, Robot and Nightfall from Asimov's oeuvre). Like Dick, I tend to find his ideas more interesting than his characters - he does better with his characters, but on the other hand his ideas (though cool) are less mind-blowing. So far, Nightfall is by far my favorite, despite the "uh-huh, and?" ending.
Maybe the reason the Foundation series is so highly regarded, though, is that it's structured more like an epic than Asimov's other stuff?
I started Stranger in a Strange Land several years ago, but just sorta stopped after a while and had no interest in picking it back up again.
On the other side of the coin, I read The Man in the High Castle, a year or two ago, and while it managed to hold my interest throughout, I obviously didn't get it at all, and I didn't like it so much that I feel a particular urge to reread until I figure it out.
at 22:19 on 04-09-2013
I really never got the Foundation thing. I loved Asimov's other stuff, so I find it really weird how that seems to be what gets the attention.
at 21:41 on 04-09-2013
, James D
Yeah, there's a reason I cited that and a latter-day Foundation novel as examples of books which only one because of whose name was attached to them. I'm convinced that Foundation's Edge only got the Hugo because the original trilogy missed out, and as for latter-day Heinlein, ugh.
I haven't read the Foundation series since I was a teenager but I remember the later ones being at least readable, though inferior to the original trilogy (which wasn't that great to begin with).
Of course, Foundation's Edge beat out The Sword of the Lictor, which just makes me want to hit everyone who voted.
at 21:17 on 04-09-2013
What about the parts that are basically a heavy-handed author screed about how not being poly is just unelightened and awful? Weren't those... great?
Ooooo, or the parts where it turns out it's alright to murder people willy-nilly because they'll get reincarnated anyway. So it's not really murder it's just, like, a time-out.