Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.
How To Tell If You Are In A Soft Science Fiction Novel
How To Tell If You Are In A High Fantasy Novel
On The Conspiracy, that sort of anti-natalist pessimism is supposed to be kind of depressive, I think, but for some reason, I find it sort of endearing. It's sort of like realizing the four truths of Buddhism and then just dwelling on it, instead of trying to accept it.
Ibmiller: I love Zahn's stuff as well - Icarus Hunt and the Quadrail series in particular.
I was wondering when you'd show up for the conversation.
Okay, some of those are really funny, but many feel like they're kind of reaching to make the connection between image and quote - or maybe they require a more in-depth knowledge of of Lovecraft's works to get the full effect. Still an amusing diversion, though, thanks for sharing.
And remember: when you see the preorder button, you will know it is time.
My second favorite of his non-Star Wars stuff that I've read (and there's plenty I haven't gotten to yet), is the five-book Quadrail series, starting with Night Train to Rigel, a sort of noir train thriller ... in space.
Zahn's characters, though hardly Shakespearian, are usually fun, and I love how they often use cleverness and ingenuity to solve the problems they face in unexpected but plausible and exciting ways. Also, the man can pull out some amazing plot twists every so often.
Fair warning: Zahn seems to be pretty oblivious to issues of gender, race, etc.. He's not actively hateful, but every once in a while he'll come up with something which makes me look at the material askance. Or, in the case of Spinneret, on a semi-regular basis, but so far it's the only one, and even it has improved substantially since my last update. But just so you know.
Speaking of paranoia-prone reactionary politics, my journalist friend whose stuff I've linked once or twice before has apparently already gotten quite a bit of flak for basically saying let's not blame Muslims as a whole for the Charlie Hebdo attack or try to explain it in terms of "clash of civilizations" bullshit, mmkay?. (Oh, and also that expressing our compassion for Charlie Hebdo and outrage at the killings need not and ought not be conflated with minimizing or denying their faults.)
I'm disturbed by the apparent suggestion of mental illness as a valid alternative interpretation for the killers' motivation in the third to last paragraph, but otherwise, I think it's a solid and clear-headed article.
It feels waaaaaaaay to early in the year for Hugo talk, and yet all my feeds are brimming with it.
So... it's Jurassic Park, only in China, with a dragon?
Did anyone else hear a low, echoey voice just now?
It sounded sort of like "Neeeext Baaaactaaaa"..? And then there was some ominous chuckling.
Also I had some kind of flashback involving dozens of people called Thomas, who all turned out to be Charles Dickens in disguise.
Funnily enough, I have a Jurassic Park article half-completed anyway. I think I may need to buy this book as additional research.
It's a monster book! Set in a zoo! Written by Matthew Reilly!
(Warning: there is almost certainly a fair amount of fail coming from it being set in China)
Over the past few years, I've been cooling pretty hard on the rise of superhero franchise films, partly because there's just so damn many of them, and partly because most of them seem to be so flashy, and kick up a huge groundswell of fan hype...and yet the movies themselves are so inert, the cinematic equivalent of eating packing foam. There's exceptions, of course; at times it felt like Guardians of the Galaxy felt like an actual film that was trying and failed to escape Marvel's claws, but even things like the Captain America movies I just find...so boring.
A few days ago, I found an article on Grantland that talked quite a bit about how Hollywood's been changing over the last few years, and I gotta say, I have concerns. The basic argument is that the great problem isn't superheroes per se, it's the fact that Hollywood is starting to think in terms of five-, seven-, and ten-year plans, that studios are increasingly thinking in terms of nothing but franchises, and we're going to see more and more studio heads that come wholly out of the corporate track.
This is not good.
I think my favourite quote from that piece has to be
Even to this day, the opposition to GamerGate has focused on smear tactics, name calling, false equivalencies and a variety of other dirty tricks.
*gasps, clutches pearls, etc.*