Playpen

Welcome to the Playpen, our space for ferrety banter and whimsical snippets of things that aren't quite long enough for articles (although they might be) but that caught your eye anyway.

at 15:40 on 03-08-2009, Jamie Johnston
(And when I say 'yesterday' I of course mean 'more than a week ago'. Ahem.)
permalink
at 12:45 on 02-08-2009, Jamie Johnston
Some interesting and informative things were said (in particular by Dave Bartram), along with a couple of utterly daft things (in particular by Donna Ballman), on yesterday's Litopia After Dark podcast about the issue of CRB checks for authors. Also some interesting things about Amazon's Orwell kindle fail. Quite a good episode generally, in fact.
permalink
at 03:00 on 01-08-2009, Robinson L
Has anyone read the email written by Boston police officer Justin Barrett concerning the arrest of Henry Louis Gates? He comes off as a wee bit psychotic.
Why yes I do believe I detect a bit of froth around the edges. Not also where the author appears to be referring to Gates as a "banana-eating jungle monkey." No Unfortunate Implications there at all.

Oh look, I can read the rest of it after all. Hadn't figured that out before ...
permalink
at 23:08 on 31-07-2009, Rude Cyrus
Has anyone read the email written by Boston police officer Justin Barrett concerning the arrest of Henry Louis Gates? He comes off as a wee bit psychotic.
permalink
at 19:16 on 31-07-2009, Andy G
The Twilight tattoos have also been featured at Tiger Beatdown.
permalink
at 18:55 on 31-07-2009, Shim
I quite liked this line: "...implication that Brazil is steampunk...", since the way the italics on Brazil are lost made it sound a lot more interesting than the article turned out.

Also I would like to see Megalithpunk - but isn't it really just heavy rock?
permalink
at 18:15 on 31-07-2009, Arthur B
Interesting. I'm slightly puzzled by the article's implication that Brazil is steampunk (or, to be precise, its implication that adherents of steampunk take it as an aesthetic source). Really? Can anyone explain?

I raged at that. It's more likely people are describing Brazil as "1940s-punk" or "Depressionpunk" or whatever, but it's still a galling example of an appalling trend. Is it set in an alternate history or an indeterminate time? Does it have a cool aesthetic? Well, let's slap -punk on the end of a word and assimilate it into our precious movement! Steampunk, Renaissancepunk, Medievalpunk, Oilpunk, Windpunk, Bronzepunk, Megalithpunk, I'm sick of the lot of it. Cyberpunk was never about being retro, you cretins.

Gah!
permalink
at 18:10 on 31-07-2009, Viorica
because the first thing I think when I see the injunction "Commit an act of lust" is "take my picture with someone."

Ooh, take those pictures harder baby . . .
permalink
at 17:54 on 31-07-2009, Jamie Johnston
Oooh! There's an article on steampunk in the New York Times, which only reinforces my conviction that it's a totally empty aesthetic with nothing going for it beyond a fleeting "this is kinda cool."

Interesting. I'm slightly puzzled by the article's implication that Brazil is steampunk (or, to be precise, its implication that adherents of steampunk take it as an aesthetic source). Really? Can anyone explain?
permalink
at 14:37 on 31-07-2009, Guy
Those twilight tattoos make me half-want to go and get quotations from something really bad tattooed forever on my skin, like maybe "Dragons: Lexicon Triumvirate".
permalink
at 15:02 on 30-07-2009, Robinson L
Did anybody hear about EA's lastest spectacular marketingfail 'Sin to Win'
Yeah, I followed the link in Viorica's "Not So Lovely."

... Right, because the first thing I think when I see the injunction "Commit an act of lust" is "take my picture with someone." I mean, the last time I was out on a date, I totally ... yeah. (Actually, the last time I was out on a date, taking our picture together probably would've been racy compared to the rest of the evening.) Hmm, considering most of the group pictures of me out there are probably with one or more of my sisters ... oh God, does anybody know the contact information of a really good shrink?

And of course, well all know about the Catholic Church's draconian zero-tolerance policy toward cameras for just this very reason. I hear they're considering a ban on all forms of tourism, because we all know what that can lead to ...

Really, EA, as if those women didn't get too much crap from some people already.

Omigodomigodohmigod.
Twilight tatoos?

...

Excuse me, I have to go gouge out my eyeballs now.
permalink
at 13:57 on 30-07-2009, Wardog permalink
at 12:04 on 30-07-2009, Arthur B
The main thing which got to me about Doug Baley's article is that comments on news websites are so trivially easy to ignore. I just had to check because I couldn't for the life of me remember whether the Independent article about David Shayler that I linked to a few posts down had a comments section or not (it does), because I completely ignored it the first time I read the article. They're one of those things that sooner or later your brain trains itself to not even perceive unless you make the effort to look for it, a bit like banner adverts.
permalink
at 11:28 on 30-07-2009, Dan H
To be fair to Grumpy Media Consultant Doug Baley, he does *sort of* have a point. There's a rebuttal here which is significantly more annoying than the original article (it even cites that sodding Time Magazine Person of the Year thing for fuck's sake).

The thing is that journalists *are* better qualified to comment on the news than other people. Because it's their fucking *job*. Most comments on news websites are, in fact, some combination of asinine, reactionary, and just plain wrong.

Ironically I think Mr Baley and his irate detractor both make the same mistake, which is thinking that comments forms are supposed to be serious journalism, when they're actually a lot more like the letters page of a sunday magazine.
permalink
at 10:38 on 30-07-2009, Wardog
Oooh! There's an article on steampunk in the New York Times, which only reinforces my conviction that it's a totally empty aesthetic with nothing going for it beyond a fleeting "this is kinda cool."
permalink
at 10:23 on 30-07-2009, Arthur B
Like commenting on articles? Fuck you, says grumpy media consultant.
permalink
at 10:21 on 30-07-2009, Arthur B
British readers might remember David Shayler, the former MI5 employee who got in trouble for blowing the whistle about a mixture of demonstrable incompetence, vaguely provable shiftiness, and entirely unprovable conspiracy theories in the UK intelligence services. (The wikipedia page for him has a reasonably balanced writeup of his allegations).

Some of you might even remember how he declared himself the Messiah and the reincarnation of King Arthur and some Jewish revolutionary who totally wasn't Jesus but had an extremely similar life to Jesus.

Anyway, his descent into the fringe continues. The Daily Mail and Telegraph, true to form, have made a big deal about the cross-dressing, but the Independent article makes it clear that that's far and away the most mainstream and understandable thing he's done of late.

(I saw him speak at the Oxford Union some years back, before the jail sentence and the Messiah complex and Dolores. His speaking style reminded me of David Icke's even then.)
permalink
at 10:20 on 30-07-2009, Wardog
Sorry for the spill of random in the playpen but I am bored. Dude Watchin' With the Brontes. What's not to love about a comic called Hark, a vagrant!
permalink
at 10:18 on 30-07-2009, Wardog
This is entirely pointless, but there's a tabletop RPG available based on Commedia dell’Arte. It's probably pretentious and terrible but it has the best name ever: The Penguin Harlequinade! (sadly no penguins in the actual game - how tragic is that?!)
permalink
at 10:14 on 30-07-2009, Wardog
Did anybody here about EA's lastest spectacular marketingfail 'Sin to Win' - there's an article over at Ars Technica covering the fail, which comicon attendees are invited to sexual harrass the boothe babes *cough* costumed reps *cough*. Of course, EA have apologised. My favourite line is "by commmit acts of lust" we meant "take photos with." And by "hit you in the face.." I meant...
permalink
at 03:46 on 30-07-2009, Rami
According to some casual browsing I've just done, the actual radiation causing the keratosis is usually years in the past, and once it's been treated (apparently one treats it much like one does a wart) you just need to have your doctor look at it every year or so to make sure it's fine. So, <crosses fingers> you should be fine.
permalink
at 01:02 on 30-07-2009, Rude Cyrus
I'm fine, although I'm not sure what caused it -- I spend very little time in the sun. More likely it's a side effect of radiotherapy I recieved as a child. It's just something I should keep an eye out for in the future.
permalink
at 00:03 on 30-07-2009, Wardog
Um, gosh - for a long moment I thought that was an especially oblique comment on the white-washing of YA cover art.

Are you okay?
permalink